On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 08:35:37 +0100 Edmund Grimley Evans
wrote:
> > disable them for now.
>
> Not "disable", of course, but "ignore". It would be useful to see the
> results in the log.
>
>
I don't have all the results for 4.12 because it doesn't build
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Gert Wollny wrote:
> In summary, the package is too big for me to fix bugs like these in my
> spare time, usually I just forward bugs to upstream, but since they are
> not interested in fixing other archs than amd64 and i386 I'm not going
>
Am Donnerstag, den 10.08.2017, 08:33 +0100 schrieb Edmund Grimley
Evans:
> > As far as I can see all tests are disabled, failing tests means
> > that
> > the software has bugs, and I'm not sure whether we want to allow
> > software with known bugs into the archives.
>
> Yes, but if the bug is in
> As far as I can see all tests are disabled, failing tests means that
> the software has bugs, and I'm not sure whether we want to allow
> software with known bugs into the archives.
Yes, but if the bug is in the test then disabling the test is one way
of fixing the bug.
On the other hand, a
Hello,
>As far as I can see all tests are disabled, failing tests means that
>the software has bugs, and I'm not sure whether we want to allow
>software with known bugs into the archives. At the least it must be
>documented which tests are failing.
>Gianfranco, since you did the upload to
> Ubuntu built 4.9.0, 4.10.0 and 4.10.1 on arm64:
>
> http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/pool/universe/i/insighttoolkit4/
>
> Though it looks like they may have ignored a few test failures to get
> there:
>
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/insighttoolkit4/+changelog
As far as I can
Control: user debian-...@lists.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 + arm64
Please consider adding arm64.
Ubuntu built 4.9.0, 4.10.0 and 4.10.1 on arm64:
http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/pool/universe/i/insighttoolkit4/
Though it looks like they may have ignored a few test failures to get there:
Upstream has improved architecture support in 4.8.0, to be released in
about a week. However, more software quality dashboard [1] builds are
needed as are contributors to address detected issues. :-)
Steve Robbins has submitted Debian Sid for i386 and amd64 builds for
many years, which has helped
However, I make no distinction: software that builds but doesn't run
correctly is no more valuable than software that doesn't build.
Are you sure that the software is not running correctly on other
architectures? It could just be that some tests are buggy. They often
are, in my experience.
Can
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:35:37AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 01:14:13AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
It seems that insighttoolkit4 4.4.2-2 restricted itself to support
i386 and amd64. The only reason I can find for that is that the
test suite had some errors on
On September 27, 2013 09:22:58 AM Kurt Roeckx wrote:
As far as I can see, it builds, it just fails in the test suite.
Sometimes the build itself fails but often it is indeed the test cases.
However, I make no distinction: software that builds but doesn't run
correctly is no more valuable
Source: insighttoolkit4
Version: 4.4.2-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems that insighttoolkit4 4.4.2-2 restricted itself to support
i386 and amd64. The only reason I can find for that is that the
test suite had some errors on the other arches. I generally find
this a poor excuse to drop support
severity 724711 wishlist
thanks
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 01:14:13AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
It seems that insighttoolkit4 4.4.2-2 restricted itself to support
i386 and amd64. The only reason I can find for that is that the
test suite had some errors on the other arches. I generally find
13 matches
Mail list logo