Bug#777043: Shark / libshark packaging status
I have pushed the repository to d-science and filed an RFS for the initial upload of Shark. If someone could have a look at it and sponsor it, that would be awesome. Thanks, Ghis
Bug#777043: Shark / libshark packaging status
Hi Ghislain, I've tried an upload this morning but it was rejected for reasons I do not understand. Need to check this when I might sit behind a faster connection again. I'm perfectly fine if somebody else might beat me in this (as always). Kind regards Andreas. On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 08:00:18PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > I have pushed the repository to d-science and filed an RFS for the initial > upload of Shark. > > If someone could have a look at it and sponsor it, that would be awesome. > > Thanks, > Ghis > > -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#777043: Shark / libshark packaging status
I think I know. I must have involuntarily pushed to ftp-master instead of ftp-mentors yesterday when I tried to fix an incomplete upload to mentors. It happened before with Gianfranco and I believe he had to manually dcut the package from ftp-master before uploading. Ghis On 11/12/15 07:22, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Ghislain, I've tried an upload this morning but it was rejected for reasons I do not understand. Need to check this when I might sit behind a faster connection again. I'm perfectly fine if somebody else might beat me in this (as always). Kind regards Andreas. On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 08:00:18PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: I have pushed the repository to d-science and filed an RFS for the initial upload of Shark. If someone could have a look at it and sponsor it, that would be awesome. Thanks, Ghis
Bug#777043: Shark / libshark packaging status
On 30/11/15 12:42, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Go ahead and work on. I packaged this as it was a dependency for something one of our customers wanted but interest seems to have been reduced since then. So I'm happy passing this on to someone else. MfG Goswin Thanks for passing this on to me. Is there any further action to take on this ITP as a result ? Ghis
Bug#777043: Shark / libshark packaging status
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:24:12AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > Thanks for passing this on to me. Is there any further action to take on > this ITP as a result ? Uploading? :-P Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#777043: Shark / libshark packaging status
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 12:01:40PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > Once again, I will require some of your sponsorship magic when the time > comes ;-) Just ping me as usual Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#777043: Shark / libshark packaging status
On 01/12/15 10:33, Andreas Tille wrote: On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:24:12AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: Thanks for passing this on to me. Is there any further action to take on this ITP as a result ? Uploading? :-P Which might be happening soon, upstream has been very responsive to my initial packaging feedback. Once again, I will require some of your sponsorship magic when the time comes ;-) Ghis
Bug#777043: Shark / libshark packaging status
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 12:22:19PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > from my outsiders perspective I would assume that if you checked whether > Goswins work contains something that might be relevant for the packaging > and is not yet in your repository and upload as team upload in Debian > Science things should be fine. I'd recommend to drop a note in the > repository inside Debian Med about the new location. > > Surely Goswin as owner of the ITP has a last word but from the Debian > Med teams point of view any progress that leads to an upload of the > package is welcome. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 09:32:56AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I recently pushed a candidate source package for Shark [1] to the d-science > > package repositories [2]. After more careful reading of the different ITP / > > RFP bugs filed for Shark [3][4], I just realized that someone had already > > started working on it a while back (Goswin). > > > > Please correct if I am wrong but it seems that no upload to the main archive > > has been done so far for Shark. And rightfully so, since there are some > > licensing issues in the distributed files (bug filed upstream) and quite a > > bit of patching had to be done to fix the build system (PR sent upstream). > > So as of today, I would advise against sponsoring an upload for it just yet, > > although the packaging is ready (lintian-free, upstream metdata, > > autopkgtest...). > > > > I don't know how you guys want to handle the duplication, but I wanted to > > confirm that I am happy to join force with Goswin should he want to > > co-maintain this package with me. > > > > [1] https://github.com/Shark-ML/Shark > > [2] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/shark.git > > [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595485 > > [4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777043 > > > > Best regards, > > Ghislain Go ahead and work on. I packaged this as it was a dependency for something one of our customers wanted but interest seems to have been reduced since then. So I'm happy passing this on to someone else. MfG Goswin
Bug#777043: Shark / libshark packaging status
Hi, from my outsiders perspective I would assume that if you checked whether Goswins work contains something that might be relevant for the packaging and is not yet in your repository and upload as team upload in Debian Science things should be fine. I'd recommend to drop a note in the repository inside Debian Med about the new location. Surely Goswin as owner of the ITP has a last word but from the Debian Med teams point of view any progress that leads to an upload of the package is welcome. Kind regards Andreas. On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 09:32:56AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Dear all, > > I recently pushed a candidate source package for Shark [1] to the d-science > package repositories [2]. After more careful reading of the different ITP / > RFP bugs filed for Shark [3][4], I just realized that someone had already > started working on it a while back (Goswin). > > Please correct if I am wrong but it seems that no upload to the main archive > has been done so far for Shark. And rightfully so, since there are some > licensing issues in the distributed files (bug filed upstream) and quite a > bit of patching had to be done to fix the build system (PR sent upstream). > So as of today, I would advise against sponsoring an upload for it just yet, > although the packaging is ready (lintian-free, upstream metdata, > autopkgtest...). > > I don't know how you guys want to handle the duplication, but I wanted to > confirm that I am happy to join force with Goswin should he want to > co-maintain this package with me. > > [1] https://github.com/Shark-ML/Shark > [2] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/shark.git > [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595485 > [4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777043 > > Best regards, > Ghislain > > -- http://fam-tille.de
