On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:33:23 +0100 Claude Krantz
wrote:
>
> Dear Thomas,
>
> As far as I understand Hendriks analysis, there is indeed nothing upstream
> FVWM
> can do about this. He included the fvwm mailing list before his analysis
> showed
> that the bug is
Hi,
Thomas Adam writes:
> On 28 February 2016 at 23:05, Hendrik Tews wrote:
>> The XKEYBOARD doc clearly say, no Xkb function should be called
>> if the server does not provide XKEYBOARD. And indeed, inside
>> vnc4server, XkbKeycodeToKeysym does
Dear Thomas,
As far as I understand Hendriks analysis, there is indeed nothing upstream FVWM
can do about this. He included the fvwm mailing list before his analysis showed
that the bug is introduced in Debian.
Hendriks analysis indeed suggests to me that, until all X servers shipped with
On 28 February 2016 at 23:05, Hendrik Tews wrote:
> The XKEYBOARD doc clearly say, no Xkb function should be called
> if the server does not provide XKEYBOARD. And indeed, inside
> vnc4server, XkbKeycodeToKeysym does always return 0. (I attach a
> small test program that
Hendrik Tews writes:
> I found the culprit: It's the Debian deprecated.patch, which I
> attach below, in case you are interested.
I analyzed the problem a bit further. The patch deprecated.patch
replaces various occurrences of XKeycodeToKeysym with
XkbKeycodeToKeysym,
Here is the patch. To me it looks like these changes have been
introduced in the first 2.6.5 Debian package.
Bye,
Hendrik
This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential,
and/or privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any
review, copying, or
I found the culprit: It's the Debian deprecated.patch, which I
attach below, in case you are interested.
This means it's a Debian packaging bug. Debian applies this
deprecated.patch during build, thereby apparently making fvwm
incompatible with the X xerver running inside vnc.
In retrospect, I
Hendrik Tews writes:
> Dan Espen writes:
>
>> On the Debian list they say:
>>
>> So after all, this bug may have been triggered by a change in VNC
>> rather than in FVWM.
>>
>> I don't see how Fvwm can help.
>> Try the VNC folks.
>
> I
Dan Espen writes:
> On the Debian list they say:
>
> So after all, this bug may have been triggered by a change in VNC
> rather than in FVWM.
>
> I don't see how Fvwm can help.
> Try the VNC folks.
I agree that it looks like the problem is outside fvwm. However,
I
Hi,
[reincluding the fvwm list, because I still have the hope that
our observations might trigger an idea that leads to a solution]
Claude, thanks for restating your FreeBSD observation, I was not
aware of that. From that I conclude that the bug is fixed or
introduced by either
- the Debian or
Dear Hendrick,
Thanks for pointing out that this issue has been raised before on the
fvwm mailing list:
https://www.mail-archive.com/fvwm@lists.math.uh.edu/msg16901.html
Indeed the problem Raphael describes seem identical to the one I have
with fvwm 2.6.5 inside tightvncserver on Debian.
Hendrik Tews writes:
> Dear all,
>
> [sorry for crossposting - but I would like to connect different
> sources about this problem]
>
> The problem is that fvwm does not install any keybindings when
> started inside a vncserver, see Debian bug #784328 or Raphael's
> post
12 matches
Mail list logo