Bug#796020: Bug#796497: reconsidering the removal of ruby-hpricot

Hi Michael, Michael Crusoe wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 06:26:06PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > > > - something else can replace ruby-ronn and we manage to make reverse > > > (build) dependencies switch to it. > > > > Before starting to use ronn in an official release of > >

Bug#796020: Bug#796497: reconsidering the removal of ruby-hpricot

On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi Antonio, > > Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 06:26:06PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > > - something else can replace ruby-ronn and we manage to make reverse > > (build) dependencies switch

Bug#796020: Bug#796497: reconsidering the removal of ruby-hpricot

Hi Antonio, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 06:26:06PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > > We're not going to have ruby-hpricot in stretch. > > ruby-hpricot has now only 2 reverse dependencies: ruby-ronn and > ruby-fast-fs. However, the number of packages build-depending