Hi Stefan,
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> A bit, but not as much as I would have liked. And I didn't have time to do
> any
> testing. But what I have seen looked good.
[..]
> If you think that you will have some time to also deal with any severe
> regressions that may pop up, I am
Hi Raphael,
On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 09:56:41 CEST Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch. I will take a look next week-end.
>
> Did you have the time to review my changes?
A bit, but not as much as I would have liked. And I didn't have
Hi,
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Thanks for the patch. I will take a look next week-end.
Did you have the time to review my changes? If no, when do you expect to
be able to look at them?
I would gladly offer an NMU if you don't have the time (as I'm rather
confident in the work d
Thanks for the patch. I will take a look next week-end.
Cheers,
Stefan
Hi,
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Mathieu Parent (Debian) wrote:
> can you improve it a bit to use Type=notify.
I saw they backported mod_systemd to Apache 2.4 but I don't know
if we should do the same or just wait until we have Apache 2.5.
I opted to not do it in this patchset but the Apache maintainers
hello Raphaƫl,
2016-09-21 11:28 GMT+02:00 Raphael Hertzog :
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> Hi Stehan,
>
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> I'm going to work on this as we really want apache2 in stretch to have a
>> unit file so that we can benefit from all the systemd features for
>
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi Stehan,
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I'm going to work on this as we really want apache2 in stretch to have a
> unit file so that we can benefit from all the systemd features for
> Apache too.
Please find attached the patches to apply on your git repo
Hi,
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> I've tried to support extra instances too but that's untested. Enabling
> an instance would just mean to drop a symlink like
> /etc/systemd/system/apache2.target.wants/apache2@-foo.service ->
> /lib/systemd/system/apache2@.service
I don't see any ap
Hi Stefan,
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> I will take a stab at separating htcacheclean in the init script and
> adding a2enmod support. This is a necessary first step for adding unit
> files.
I saw that there is now an "apache-htcacheclean" init script. We should
thus be able to
26.03.2016, 10:06, Stefan Fritsch kirjoitti:
> Because of the things outlined above, I think the systemd unit should
> still use the envvars file. Probably this is best achieved by calling
> apachectl instead of apache2 directly.
Sure thing, looks like it works just fine with apache2ctl and then
Hi Timo,
thanks for your help.
There are a few more things to consider here. We will still have to
support using sysv-init and init scripts. Also, in practice, support
for apache2 in Debian/Ubuntu is mostly done on upstream mailing lists.
And people expect that apachectl will work correctly. B
Hi, attached is a diff that adds systemd support, derived from Fedora
and modified to suit Debian better.
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 21:49:39 +0100 Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> This is not that easy because of all the logic that we have in the
> init script.
>
> One part is about starting/stopping htcache
This is not that easy because of all the logic that we have in the
init script.
One part is about starting/stopping htcacheclean if mod_cache_disk is
enabled. Maybe instead of doing this check at apache2 startup, this
could be split into a separate service and a2enmod could active the
htcachec
Package: apache2
Severity: wishlist
Dear maintainers,
thanks for your work on this important pacakge. It's really appreciated.
Current apache2 package lacks of systemd service file (though is well
integrated with systemd due to glue scripts)
I would like to have a native systemd service file. A
14 matches
Mail list logo