On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 20:52:12 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>
> > That is, is it really, really impossible to use the compatibility
> > package which actually works on Fedora to resolve this?
>
> can you please add more information on that?
> how does it work?
>
>
> That is, is it really, really impossible to use the compatibility
> package which actually works on Fedora to resolve this?
can you please add more information on that?
how does it work?
G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 01:20:15 +0100 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2016-01-09 01:05, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>
> > I'm asking because there are two options:
> >
> > - pushing the current upstream version, with a transition, involving
> > around 30 rdepends, needing
Hi
On 2016-01-08, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: lirc
> Version: 0.9.0~pre1-1.2
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> lirc has a build-depends on libusb-dev. A few years ago upstream
> has released a new major version libusb 1.0 with a different API which
> aims to fix design
On 2016-01-09 01:05, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 2016-01-08, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: lirc
> > Version: 0.9.0~pre1-1.2
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > lirc has a build-depends on libusb-dev. A few years ago upstream
> > has released a new major
5 matches
Mail list logo