I would like to suggest closing this issue. I have never seen it again.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona
Hi Martin,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 09:04:59PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 08:57:43AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > while we reverted the change in 229, we don't want to carry the
> > reversion forever. Also, some problems were fixed already in 230, like
> > [1]. I forwarded
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 08:57:43AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> while we reverted the change in 229, we don't want to carry the
> reversion forever. Also, some problems were fixed already in 230, like
> [1]. I forwarded this upstream to
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3663,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:55:19AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Marc Haber [2016-07-06 11:52 +0200]:
> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:49:17AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > This looks the same for 229, 230/upstream and 230/sid (with the
> > > reverted patch). Thus I cannot confirm that networkd
Hello Marc,
Marc Haber [2016-07-06 11:52 +0200]:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:49:17AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > This looks the same for 229, 230/upstream and 230/sid (with the
> > reverted patch). Thus I cannot confirm that networkd ignores these
> > unsolicited router advertisements.
>
>
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:49:17AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> This looks the same for 229, 230/upstream and 230/sid (with the
> reverted patch). Thus I cannot confirm that networkd ignores these
> unsolicited router advertisements.
Can you, just for reference, try with systemd 229-1, just to see
Hello Marc,
Marc Haber [2016-07-06 9:42 +0200]:
> I think this particular issue can be triggered by:
>
> - set up a router running radvd
> - start up a client with networkd and systemd IPv6 implementation
> - manually remove any IPv6 address and IPv6 route from the client
> - restart the radvd
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 09:29:35AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Marc Haber [2016-07-06 9:03 +0200]:
> > > Do you have some instructions how this can be reproduced? It sounds
> > > like it should be possible to test this using a veth pair, possibly a
> > > dnsmasq on one end, and some ip commands.
Hey Marc,
Marc Haber [2016-07-06 9:03 +0200]:
> > Do you have some instructions how this can be reproduced? It sounds
> > like it should be possible to test this using a veth pair, possibly a
> > dnsmasq on one end, and some ip commands. Then I'd like to write a
> > test case for [2].
> >
> >
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 08:57:43AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> while we reverted the change in 229, we don't want to carry the
> reversion forever. Also, some problems were fixed already in 230, like
> [1]. I forwarded this upstream to
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3663,
Control: reopen -1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hello Marc,
while we reverted the change in 229, we don't want to carry the
reversion forever. Also, some problems were fixed already in 230, like
[1]. I forwarded this upstream to
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3663, and will now play
relay
Hi Martin,
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 10:20:22PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Marc Haber [2016-02-24 15:01 +0100]:
> > systemd 229 seems to ignore unsolicited router advertisements. This
> > breaks, for example, prefix changes. And it prevents the self-healing
> > characteristics of lost router
Hello Marc,
Marc Haber [2016-02-24 15:01 +0100]:
> systemd 229 seems to ignore unsolicited router advertisements. This
> breaks, for example, prefix changes. And it prevents the self-healing
> characteristics of lost router solicitations.
Can you please report this and also #815884 upstream? I
13 matches
Mail list logo
