On 2017-02-01 13:29:38, Ana C. Custura wrote:
> Hi Antoine.
>
> Thank you very much for your help with this! If upstream clarifies the
> version situation I will update the package/make the necessary changes.
> Will also do a backport for stretch when the time comes.
That's great, let me know when
Hi Antoine.
Thank you very much for your help with this! If upstream clarifies the
version situation I will update the package/make the necessary changes.
Will also do a backport for stretch when the time comes.
Regards,
Ana
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017, at 11:08 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2017-01-
On 2017-01-20 13:41:49, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2017-01-20 16:23:02, Ana C. Custura wrote:
>> Hi Antoine,
>>
>> Many thanks for the review, it is greatly appreciated.
>
> Alright, that looks all good to me. The only concern that remains is
> that I just noticed a 1.5.1 release on PyPI that is
On 2017-01-20 16:23:02, Ana C. Custura wrote:
> Hi Antoine,
>
> Many thanks for the review, it is greatly appreciated.
Alright, that looks all good to me. The only concern that remains is
that I just noticed a 1.5.1 release on PyPI that is not on github - i
wonder if we should be shipping that in
Hi Antoine,
Many thanks for the review, it is greatly appreciated.
> (1) The package description could be improved... Use more spaces between
> paragraphs.
Done.
> (2) Also, I would remove the series of questions on the first lines of
> the description. We are aiming at more neutral descriptio
On 2017-01-09 14:25:50, Ana C. Custura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if you're still interested in sponsoring this, it's
> still on mentors if you happen to have time to look at it. If not,
> that's ok as there's someone else I can potentially ask.
>
> Let me know and thanks again!
Hi,
Sorry f
Hi,
I was wondering if you're still interested in sponsoring this, it's
still on mentors if you happen to have time to look at it. If not,
that's ok as there's someone else I can potentially ask.
Let me know and thanks again!
Regards,
Ana
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016, at 03:08 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote
Hi,
I will unfortunately not be able to followup with this until january.
Please find another mentor if you wish to get earlier feedback.
Otherwise you will probably have to re-upload this when I need to look
at it again, because packages expire quickly on mentors.d.n... :/
Sorry for the inconv
Hi,
I've uploaded the package to mentors.debian.net:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/dnsdiag
Looking forward to your feedback.
Ana
PS: sorry for the wait, have ended up being very busy for the past 2
months.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016, at 07:52 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2016-10-18 14:17:0
On 2016-10-18 14:17:00, Ana C. Custura wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016, at 03:30 PM, anarcat wrote:
>
>> I believe this removes the last blocker you have documented for
>> packaging this.
>>
>> Good luck with the packaging, let me know if you need help!
>
> Great news, thanks! Aiming to get it done
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016, at 03:30 PM, anarcat wrote:
> I believe this removes the last blocker you have documented for
> packaging this.
>
> Good luck with the packaging, let me know if you need help!
Great news, thanks! Aiming to get it done by the end of the week.
If you don't mind you could che
Glad to see some progress on this.
It seems that the patches for dnspython have all been merged upstream
and that dnsdiag now uses dnspython cleanly:
https://github.com/farrokhi/dnsdiag/issues/17#issuecomment-254445188
I believe this removes the last blocker you have documented for
packaging thi
retitle 824670 ITP: dnsdiag -- DNS Diagnostics and Performance
Measurement Tools
owner 824670 !
block 824670 by 826729
thanks
13 matches
Mail list logo