Bug#828351: inn2: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-12-23 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 09:36:25AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 29, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > Please find attached a patch against the package which includes the > > three three patches mentioned here and was sbuild tested. > > Should I NMU it? > NO! I have a new package ready

Bug#828351: inn2: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-30 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Nov 29, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Please find attached a patch against the package which includes the > three three patches mentioned here and was sbuild tested. > Should I NMU it? NO! I have a new package ready, but it needs some mild testing. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Descrip

Bug#828351: inn2: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-29 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
control: tags -1 patch fixed-upstream On 2016-06-27 15:56:40 [+0200], Julien ÉLIE wrote: > I suggest to release a 2.6.0-3 Debian package containing upstream commits > 9988 and 10024. (And, while we're at it, also upstream commit 9986 that > removes TCP_NODELAY for nnrpd.) > It will normally permi

Bug#828351: inn2: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-27 Thread Julien ÉLIE
Hi all, Source: inn2 Version: 2.6.0-2 OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. I suggest to release a 2.6.0-3 Debian package containing upstream commits 9988 and 10024. (And, while we're at it, also upstream commit 9986

Bug#828351: inn2: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Source: inn2 Version: 2.6.0-2 Severity: important Control: block 827061 by -1 Hi, OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/in