Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2016-09-03 at 00:09 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 02.09.2016 um 22:12 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> > Sorry for the delays. I've been arguing with myself about the fsck fix
> > as well, but I'd be happy for the remainder to be uploaded.
>
> Ok then, uploaded
Am 02.09.2016 um 22:12 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> Sorry for the delays. I've been arguing with myself about the fsck fix
> as well, but I'd be happy for the remainder to be uploaded.
Ok then, uploaded with that one particular change backed out.
Regards,
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the
# see note at end
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 01:43 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 18.08.2016 um 23:41 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > Am 04.08.2016 um 22:13 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> >> Am 03.08.2016 um 22:41 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 22:32:16
Am 18.08.2016 um 23:41 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 04.08.2016 um 22:13 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> Am 03.08.2016 um 22:41 schrieb Julien Cristau:
>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 22:32:16 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>>
Am 29.07.2016 um 23:00 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 29.07.2016 um 14:00
Am 04.08.2016 um 22:13 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 03.08.2016 um 22:41 schrieb Julien Cristau:
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 22:32:16 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>
>>> Am 29.07.2016 um 23:00 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Am 29.07.2016 um 14:00 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> This looks fine in general,
Am 03.08.2016 um 22:41 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 22:32:16 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> Am 29.07.2016 um 23:00 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>>> Am 29.07.2016 um 14:00 schrieb Julien Cristau:
This looks fine in general, I'm just wondering if the effect of bumping
the
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 22:32:16 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 29.07.2016 um 23:00 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > Am 29.07.2016 um 14:00 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> >> This looks fine in general, I'm just wondering if the effect of bumping
> >> the util-linux dependency on upgrades from wheezy was
Am 29.07.2016 um 23:00 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 29.07.2016 um 14:00 schrieb Julien Cristau:
>> This looks fine in general, I'm just wondering if the effect of bumping
>> the util-linux dependency on upgrades from wheezy was considered/tested?
>
> It was not specifically tested since I didn't
Am 29.07.2016 um 14:00 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> This looks fine in general, I'm just wondering if the effect of bumping
> the util-linux dependency on upgrades from wheezy was considered/tested?
It was not specifically tested since I didn't expect any breakage
because of it. But I did it now for
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 18:59:04 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 24.07.2016 um 14:12 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > for the upcoming jessie stable release, I'd like to update the systemd
> > package with the following fixes:
>
> [..]
>
> > The complete debdiff is attached as well.
>
> I would
Am 24.07.2016 um 14:12 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> * getty-static.service: Only start if we have a working VC subsystem.
> Use ConditionPathExists=/dev/tty0, the same check as in getty@.service,
> to determine whether we have a functional VC subsystem and we should
> start any gettys.
Am 24.07.2016 um 14:12 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: jessie
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> Dear release team,
>
> for the upcoming jessie stable release, I'd like to update the systemd
> package with the
Am 24.07.2016 um 14:12 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> * Fix prepare priority queue comparison function in sd-event.
> Otherwise a disabled event source can get swapped with an enabled one
> and cause a severe sd-event malfunction, breaking the event loop.
> (Closes: #789796)
>
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear release team,
for the upcoming jessie stable release, I'd like to update the systemd
package with the following fixes:
systemd (215-17+deb8u5) stable; urgency=medium
* Use
14 matches
Mail list logo
