Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta10+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

Hi >See license.html. The project is GPL-2, but some files have GPL-2+ in >their headers. rescheduled, thanks :) and sorry for the useless question G.

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta10+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

Hello Gianfranco, On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 06:54:01PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, I put the package in deferred/5, because I'm not sure about the whole > license. > Isn't it something like GPL-2+ instead of GPL-2? > I agree single files are ok, but the "*" wildcard seems a GPL-2+ to

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta10+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

control: tag -1 -moreinfo +confirmed control: noowner -1 I consider d648533e5f1d9942a07cb9e907eec2d58b1965fb ready for upload. On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 04:47:59PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > A missing dependency libqt4-sql-sqlite caused this problem. It seems that > the automatic dh_shlibdeps

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta10+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

在 2016年11月13日星期日 CST 下午2:43:47，Sean Whitton 写道： > plus some other minor comments below. The blocker: > > hephaestus ~ % nixnote2 > QSqlDatabase: QSQLITE driver not loaded > QSqlDatabase: available drivers: QMYSQL3 QMYSQL > ERROR 2016-11-13 14:38:58.946 (

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta10+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

control: retitle 832704 RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta10+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client Dear Boyuan, On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:26:52AM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Since the dependency qevercloud has entered unstable, it is perfectly > fine to move towards nixnote2. I have prepared the

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta10+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

retitle 832704 RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta10+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client thanks Hi Sean, Since the dependency qevercloud has entered unstable, it is perfectly fine to move towards nixnote2. I have prepared the 2.0~beta10 version of nixnote2 package, which should address previous

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2

Dear Boyuan, On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 07:25:22PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > I just reviewed the latest changes in your nixnote2 git repo, as part of > confirming that nixnote2 works with the new qevercloud shlib. > > I have the following remaining suggestions (none are "must fix"): Are you

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2

Hello Boyuan, I just reviewed the latest changes in your nixnote2 git repo, as part of confirming that nixnote2 works with the new qevercloud shlib. I have the following remaining suggestions (none are "must fix"): 1. I suggested adding something to README.source explaining why the package does

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > I should be clear that what I had in mind was the question of *actually > regenerating* the files during the build process, not just the question > of including them in the source package with a promise that the > regeneration will actually

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

Hello, On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 09:41:06AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > From the links you've provided, it seems that the Evernote *.thrift > > files ought to be packaged as a build-dependency which are then used to > > generate the *.cpp files when the package is build. > > > > If it's impossible

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: >> > ... generated cpp source files in qevercloud ... >> >> That is generated from Evernote Cloud API Thrift IDL files [1], an abstract >> description of Evernote Cloud API, and generated files should be considered >> as part of the source code.

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

Hello, On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 08:07:52PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > 2016-08-25 5:41 GMT+08:00 Sean Whitton : > > You claim that the upstream files are only licensed under the GPL > > version 2 (and no later version). But looking at the headers of the .h > > and .cpp

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

Hello, 2016-08-25 5:41 GMT+08:00 Sean Whitton : > You claim that the upstream files are only licensed under the GPL > version 2 (and no later version). But looking at the headers of the .h > and .cpp files, the upstream author licenses them as GPL-2+. However, >

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:41:11AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > > > i.e. images/purple-theme/synchronize.png was probably created with the > > GIMP. That means the preferred format for modifying this file is > > probably a *.svg file.

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > i.e. images/purple-theme/synchronize.png was probably created with the > GIMP. That means the preferred format for modifying this file is > probably a *.svg file. Similarly, the other files in the theme might > have been prepared with a

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 02:41:38PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > There's a further issue with at least some of the files in images/. The > check-all-the-things tool reveals: > > # Check with upstream where the GIMP XCF source files are. > $ find -type f \( -iname '*.png' -o -iname '*.gif'

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

Hello, On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:37:12PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > Hold on, are you looking at upstream copyright file? > > That file is outdated and not used. Please check the file on Debian branch: > > > > https://github.com/hosiet/nixnote2/blob/debian/debian/copyright > > I was looking

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

Hello, On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:57:36PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > >> FYI, this software is debian-sourced because it used to contain some > >> useless scripts (custom hacky scripts for deb / rpm / targz packaging) > >> and a jar file (which is not acceptable in Java packaging). The > >>

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

Hello, 2016-08-24 11:56 GMT+08:00 Sean Whitton : >> Since it is a debian-source (ds) package, I am not sure which original >> tarball >> should be provided with pristine-tar. Anyway, I put both the ds-modified and >> the original tarball with pristine-tar inside now.

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

Hello, On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:09:31AM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Thank you for your advice. I will not force-push commits from now on. Cool, thanks :) > > (I can obtain the tarball from mentors, but you might consider > > adding it to your git repository using pristine-tar(1).) > > Since

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

Control: tag -1 -moreinfo X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ment...@lists.debian.org 2016-08-21 1:02 GMT+08:00 Sean Whitton : > control: tag -1 +moreinfo > > Please don't edit published history -- I wanted to use `git diff` to > check the changes you had made in response to my

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

control: tag -1 +moreinfo Hello, It seems that you force-pushed your GitHub repo that you mentioned in an earlier e-mail. I tried to use `git pull` to get your latest work, but that failed. Please don't edit published history -- I wanted to use `git diff` to check the changes you had made in

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta9+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

Control: reopen -1 Control: tag -1 -moreinfo X-Debbugs-CC: locutusofb...@debian.org X-Debbugs-CC: spwhit...@spwhitton.name X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org Hello all, Sorry for the accidentally removal of nixnote2 from mentors.debian.net. Upstream tagged the new version days ago and I was trying to

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

> I can't sponsor the upload, but I hope the following review is useful to > you. Thank you very much for your detailed review. I would like to explain those problems here for you and anyone who might be interested: > Since I am not familiar with Java packaging, it would be advisable to > ask on

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

control: tag -1 +moreinfo control: owner -1 ! Hello, Thanks for packaging this. Org-mode >> Evernote but enabling people to use the latter on Debian might be a useful gateway drug ... and a lot of people say that Org-mode is the gateway drug for Emacs proper ;) I can't sponsor the upload, but

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nixnote2" * Package name: nixnote2 Version : 2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 Upstream Author : Randy Baumgarte * URL