Bug#834755: apt-cacher-ng: please make the build reproducible

2016-10-18 Thread Chris Lamb
Eduard Bloch wrote: > Ehm, it looks like you did not look up the meaning of the other > tar parameters in the command line you patched ($TARARGS). Sorry about that; and thank you. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `

Bug#834755: apt-cacher-ng: please make the build reproducible

2016-10-18 Thread Eduard Bloch
Control: tags 834755 +pending Hallo, * Eduard Bloch [Mon, Oct 17 2016, 09:12:56PM]: > Hallo, > * Chris Lamb [Mon, Oct 17 2016, 10:54:53AM]: > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > > Source: apt-cacher-ng > > > Version: 0.5.1-3 > > > Tags: patch > > > > There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 59 d

Bug#834755: apt-cacher-ng: please make the build reproducible

2016-10-17 Thread Eduard Bloch
Hallo, * Chris Lamb [Mon, Oct 17 2016, 10:54:53AM]: > Dear Maintainer, > > > Source: apt-cacher-ng > > Version: 0.5.1-3 > > Tags: patch > > There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 59 days, in which > time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :) *g* > Would you consid

Bug#834755: apt-cacher-ng: please make the build reproducible

2016-10-17 Thread Chris Lamb
Dear Maintainer, > Source: apt-cacher-ng > Version: 0.5.1-3 > Tags: patch There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 59 days, in which time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :) Would you consider applying this patch and uploading? Regards, -- ,''`. : :'

Bug#834755: apt-cacher-ng: please make the build reproducible

2016-08-18 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: apt-cacher-ng Version: 0.9.3.2-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fileordering X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed that apt-cacher-ng could n