Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Ehm, it looks like you did not look up the meaning of the other
> tar parameters in the command line you patched ($TARARGS).
Sorry about that; and thank you.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`
Control: tags 834755 +pending
Hallo,
* Eduard Bloch [Mon, Oct 17 2016, 09:12:56PM]:
> Hallo,
> * Chris Lamb [Mon, Oct 17 2016, 10:54:53AM]:
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > > Source: apt-cacher-ng
> > > Version: 0.5.1-3
> > > Tags: patch
> >
> > There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 59 d
Hallo,
* Chris Lamb [Mon, Oct 17 2016, 10:54:53AM]:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> > Source: apt-cacher-ng
> > Version: 0.5.1-3
> > Tags: patch
>
> There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 59 days, in which
> time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
*g*
> Would you consid
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: apt-cacher-ng
> Version: 0.5.1-3
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 59 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :'
Source: apt-cacher-ng
Version: 0.9.3.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: fileordering
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that apt-cacher-ng could n
5 matches
Mail list logo