control: tags -1 patch pending
> because I could not figure what your patches actually did, and building
> without it just worked.
> I didn't manually close the bug (that I would have otherwise do) because
> I believe that's the maintainer responsability.
>
> I also didn't close #835966 because,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:57:34AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> A question: Why did you not apply the documentation patch threrby closing bug
> #790664? From the build logs no texi files were processed, how come?
because I could not figure what your patches actually did, and building
without it
On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 14:28 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 09:58:07PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:57:59PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > >
> > > As fas as I understand it is OK to NMU this package, based on the
> > > latest replies by
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 09:58:07PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:57:59PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > As fas as I understand it is OK to NMU this package, based on the
> > latest replies by Xavier. Unfortunately nobody from debian-ada has
> > stepped forward, and
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:57:59PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> As fas as I understand it is OK to NMU this package, based on the
> latest replies by Xavier. Unfortunately nobody from debian-ada has
> stepped forward, and Xavier is too busy, maybe you can help out here.
> I'm available whenever
On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 17:01 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:18:08PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I'm very short of time for the month - may be someone on debian-
> > > ada
> > > can test your patched package ? Can you provide an url to
> > > download it
>
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:18:08PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 14:14 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> > No, I think you don't need more tests since you have found the
> > conflict source as far as I understand.
> >
> > I'm very short of time for the month - may be someone on
On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 17:24 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:18:08PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > I don't have a natural url place to put the changes, sorry. The
> > patches
> > were attached to my first posting in this thread and time is
> > running
> > out until
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:18:08PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 14:14 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> > No, I think you don't need more tests since you have found the
> > conflict source as far as I understand.
> >
> > I'm very short of time for the month - may be someone on
On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 14:14 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> No, I think you don't need more tests since you have found the
> conflict source as far as I understand.
>
> I'm very short of time for the month - may be someone on debian-ada
> can test your patched package ? Can you provide an url to
vante Signell" <svante.sign...@gmail.com>
À: "Xavier Grave" <xavier.gr...@csnsm.in2p3.fr>
Cc: 835...@bugs.debian.org, "Mattia Rizzolo" <mat...@debian.org>,
debian-...@lists.debian.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 7 Septembre 2016 13:00:33
Objet: Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -
Sorry, the correct entries should be:
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:5001 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 11061/./bank_server
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:9099 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 11060/po_cos_naming
Then I don't know where the problem is.
Hi again,
seems like the conflicting application is qemu-system-x86_64 whichever port I
choose in examples/dsa/bank/polyorb.conf:
# cat polyorb.conf
[dsa]
name_service=corbaloc:iiop:1.2@127.0.0.1:9099/NameService/00024fF800
0
[iiop]
polyorb.protocols.iiop.default_port=5001
# cat
: Mardi 6 Septembre 2016 16:31:50
Objet: Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy
On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 11:17 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> You should also run the po_cos_naming, you can look at [1] in order to see how
> to "play" with dsa applications.
>
On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 11:17 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> You should also run the po_cos_naming, you can look at [1] in order to see how
> to "play" with dsa applications.
>
> xavier
> [1] : http://wiki.ada-dk.org/a_dsa_tutorial
>
The dsa exammple in that web page works!
The bank example almost
; <xavier.gr...@csnsm.in2p3.fr>, 835...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: "Mattia Rizzolo" <mat...@debian.org>, debian-...@lists.debian.org
Envoyé: Lundi 5 Septembre 2016 17:14:26
Objet: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy
Hi,
After installing the built packages I tried
an.org, debian-ada@l
> ists.debian.org
> Envoyé: Lundi 5 Septembre 2016 11:40:50
> Objet: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy
>
> Hi,
>
> Seems like gnatdist is needed to run the bank example. Where can I find a
> modern
> version of it?
>
> O
n-...@lists.debian.org
Envoyé: Lundi 5 Septembre 2016 11:40:50
Objet: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy
Hi,
Seems like gnatdist is needed to run the bank example. Where can I find a modern
version of it?
On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 10:37 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> Hi,
>
&
Hi again,
When issuing make examples execuables in the two test directories
examples/polyorb and example/moma are built, not the other ones.
Running the tests as indicated in the corresponding README, all four tests in
polyorb pass and in moma the tests I) to II) in the README pass and test III)
Hi,
Seems like gnatdist is needed to run the bank example. Where can I find a modern
version of it?
On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 10:37 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't upload anything any longer I'm sorry. And one have to be cautious with
> polyorb, compilation of the package doesn't mean
original -
De: "Svante Signell" <svante.sign...@gmail.com>
À: "Mattia Rizzolo" <mat...@debian.org>
Cc: "xavier grave" <xavier.gr...@csnsm.in2p3.fr>, 835...@bugs.debian.org,
debian-...@lists.debian.org
Envoyé: Dimanche 4 Septembre 2016 17:
Xavier: ping!
>From Aug 31:
> I don't see any activity going on this package, and it already has 2
> unaswered RC bugs (#790664 from half 2015).
On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 13:11 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 03:09:29PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2016-09-02
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 03:09:29PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 12:43 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:26:20PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > >
> > > With the attached patches polyorb builds fine with gcc-6/gnat-6. With
> > > these
> > >
On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 12:43 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:26:20PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > With the attached patches polyorb builds fine with gcc-6/gnat-6. With these
> > patches all serious bugs are fixed.
> >
> > * Enable build with gnat-6: Closes
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:26:20PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 16:34 +0200, xavier grave wrote:
> > Sadly, I haven't time for maintaining work anymore.
> > I have filed a RFA (#834605) against wnpp.
I wonder whether that should have been an O instead..
but your call.
>
On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 16:34 +0200, xavier grave wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
>
> Sadly, I haven't time for maintaining work anymore.
> I have filed a RFA (#834605) against wnpp.
>
> Thanks for your concern, cordially, xavier
>
> Le 29/08/2016 à 16:30, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit :
> >
> > source: polyorb
>
Hi Mattia,
Sadly, I haven't time for maintaining work anymore.
I have filed a RFA (#834605) against wnpp.
Thanks for your concern, cordially, xavier
Le 29/08/2016 à 16:30, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit :
source: polyorb
version: 2.11~20140418-3
severity: serious
Dear maintainer,
polyorb is the
source: polyorb
version: 2.11~20140418-3
severity: serious
Dear maintainer,
polyorb is the last package using gnat-4.9 for building, which means
it's the last package holding gnat-4.9 clean removal.
I don't see any activity going on this package, and it already has 2
unaswered RC bugs (#790664
28 matches
Mail list logo
