On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:16:10 -0300 Felipe Sateler
wrote:> unable to move aside './usr/share/bug/apt' to install new
version: Invalid cross-device link
> dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
I'm hitting this bug when attempting to use debian in a container backed
b
Hi,
On Sun 02 May 2021 09:06:49 GMT, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 03:01:26PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Control: reopen -1
> > Control: notfixed -1 4.10.0-1~exp1
> > Control: found -1 4.12.6-1
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > I ver
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 03:01:26PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
> Control: notfixed -1 4.10.0-1~exp1
> Control: found -1 4.12.6-1
>
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > I verified today that the issue is gone with Linux 4.12 and apparently
> > the appropriat
Control: reopen -1
Control: notfixed -1 4.10.0-1~exp1
Control: found -1 4.12.6-1
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I verified today that the issue is gone with Linux 4.12 and apparently
> the appropriate patches have been merged for Linux 4.10 already (merged by
> linus in commit ff0f9
Control: reassign -1 linux
Control: affects -1 dpkg
Hi!
[ Reassigning to linux, where this can be fixed. Upstream has provided
a preliminary patch to this bug report, which might need testing and
perhaps some polishing? Trimmed irrelevant information. ]
On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 12:16:10 -0300,
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 03:03:54PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 14:30:58 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > You are the first to report that this quirk actually causes problems
> > in real life.
> >
> > I have plans to fix this by adding a "redirector" attribute so th
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I don't know what the correct workaround should be.
Just for the record, the attached patch is what we use in Kali
to work-around this problem. It works but it's not going to be merged in
Debian because we really want a fix at the overlayfs level i
Hi!
On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 14:30:58 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> You are the first to report that this quirk actually causes problems
> in real life.
>
> I have plans to fix this by adding a "redirector" attribute so that
> copied up directories (and perhaps files) can refer to lower directory
>
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> overlayfs does not support renaming directories when the directories
>> live in the lower filesystem:
> [...]
>> Unfortunately this means that dpkg fails at least in the case where a
>> d
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> overlayfs does not support renaming directories when the directories
> live in the lower filesystem:
[...]
> Unfortunately this means that dpkg fails at least in the case where a
> directory is converted into a file: apt 1.3~rc2 moves
> /usr/share/b
On 1 Sep 2016 3:59 a.m., "Johannes Schauer" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:16:10 -0300 Felipe Sateler
wrote:
> > overlayfs does not support renaming directories when the directories
> > live in the lower filesystem:
> >
> > * Directory renames only allowed on "pure upper" (already cre
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:16:10 -0300 Felipe Sateler wrote:
> overlayfs does not support renaming directories when the directories
> live in the lower filesystem:
>
> * Directory renames only allowed on "pure upper" (already created on
> * upper filesystem, never copied up). Directories whic
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.10
Severity: normal
Hi,
overlayfs does not support renaming directories when the directories
live in the lower filesystem:
* Directory renames only allowed on "pure upper" (already created on
* upper filesystem, never copied up). Directories which are on lower or
13 matches
Mail list logo
