Bug#836211: dpkg: Cannot upgrade some packages on overlayfs: Invalid cross-device link
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:16:10 -0300 Felipe Sateler wrote:> unable to move aside './usr/share/bug/apt' to install new version: Invalid cross-device link > dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) I'm hitting this bug when attempting to use debian in a container backed by overlayfs. Kernel version on host: 5.12.8.arch1-1 It works fine with kernel 5.10.41-1. -- Tomas Krizek PGP: 4A8B A48C 2AED 933B D495 C509 A1FB A5F7 EF8C 4869 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#836211: dpkg: Cannot upgrade some packages on overlayfs: Invalid cross-device link
Hi, On Sun 02 May 2021 09:06:49 GMT, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 03:01:26PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Control: reopen -1 > > Control: notfixed -1 4.10.0-1~exp1 > > Control: found -1 4.12.6-1 > > > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > I verified today that the issue is gone with Linux 4.12 and apparently > > > the appropriate patches have been merged for Linux 4.10 already (merged by > > > linus in commit ff0f962ca3c38239b299a70e7eea27abfbb979c3). > > > > I don't know how I did my check last time, but I was wrong. The changes > > merged above fixed issues about tools being confused with the unexpected > > st_dev values on files but they did not fix the fact that overlayfs > > might return EXDEV when renaming a directory that is part of the lower > > layer. > > > > So I'm opening the bug again. > > Doing some maintenance on open kernel bugs. Is this by now still an > issue with recent kernels? If not can we close this bug? Part of the > isuses at leas were fixed in 4.10.0-1~exp1, but what about the > remaining or followup issue mentioned by Raphael? > > Regards, > Salvatore the EXDEV return value is still reproducible: $ mkdir -p /tmp/ovl/{lower/dir,upper,work,mount} $ sudo mount -t overlay -o lowerdir=/tmp/ovl/lower,upperdir=/tmp/ovl/upper,workdir=/tmp/ovl/work none /tmp/ovl/mount $ strace -e trace=rename,renameat,renameat2 mv /tmp/ovl/mount/dir /tmp/ovl/mount/newname renameat2(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp/ovl/mount/dir", AT_FDCWD, "/tmp/ovl/mount/newname", RENAME_NOREPLACE) = -1 EXDEV (Invalid cross-device link) +++ exited with 0 +++ and in dpkg sources I cannot find any special handling for EXDEV. From my point of view, the bug is still not fixed. Kind regards, Nicolas signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#836211: dpkg: Cannot upgrade some packages on overlayfs: Invalid cross-device link
Hi, On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 03:01:26PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > Control: notfixed -1 4.10.0-1~exp1 > Control: found -1 4.12.6-1 > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > I verified today that the issue is gone with Linux 4.12 and apparently > > the appropriate patches have been merged for Linux 4.10 already (merged by > > linus in commit ff0f962ca3c38239b299a70e7eea27abfbb979c3). > > I don't know how I did my check last time, but I was wrong. The changes > merged above fixed issues about tools being confused with the unexpected > st_dev values on files but they did not fix the fact that overlayfs > might return EXDEV when renaming a directory that is part of the lower > layer. > > So I'm opening the bug again. Doing some maintenance on open kernel bugs. Is this by now still an issue with recent kernels? If not can we close this bug? Part of the isuses at leas were fixed in 4.10.0-1~exp1, but what about the remaining or followup issue mentioned by Raphael? Regards, Salvatore
Bug#836211: dpkg: Cannot upgrade some packages on overlayfs: Invalid cross-device link
Control: reopen -1 Control: notfixed -1 4.10.0-1~exp1 Control: found -1 4.12.6-1 On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I verified today that the issue is gone with Linux 4.12 and apparently > the appropriate patches have been merged for Linux 4.10 already (merged by > linus in commit ff0f962ca3c38239b299a70e7eea27abfbb979c3). I don't know how I did my check last time, but I was wrong. The changes merged above fixed issues about tools being confused with the unexpected st_dev values on files but they did not fix the fact that overlayfs might return EXDEV when renaming a directory that is part of the lower layer. So I'm opening the bug again. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/
Bug#836211: dpkg: Cannot upgrade some packages on overlayfs: Invalid cross-device link
Control: reassign -1 linux Control: affects -1 dpkg Hi! [ Reassigning to linux, where this can be fixed. Upstream has provided a preliminary patch to this bug report, which might need testing and perhaps some polishing? Trimmed irrelevant information. ] On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 12:16:10 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.18.10 > Severity: normal > overlayfs does not support renaming directories when the directories > live in the lower filesystem: > > * Directory renames only allowed on "pure upper" (already created on > * upper filesystem, never copied up). Directories which are on lower or > * are merged may not be renamed. For these -EXDEV is returned and > * userspace has to deal with it. This means, when copying up a > * directory we can rely on it and ancestors being stable. > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v4.8-rc2/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c#L318-L322 > > Unfortunately this means that dpkg fails at least in the case where a > directory is converted into a file: apt 1.3~rc2 moves > /usr/share/bug/apt/script to /usr/share/bug/apt . This causes dpkg to > fail when running in an overlayfs with the following error: > > # dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb > (Reading database ... 11401 files and directories currently installed.) > Preparing to unpack .../archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb ... > Unpacking apt (1.3~rc3) over (1.3~rc2) ... > dpkg: error processing archive > /var/cache/apt/archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb (--install): > unable to move aside './usr/share/bug/apt' to install new version: Invalid > cross-device link > dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) > Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.23-5) ... > Errors were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb > > I don't know what the correct workaround should be. > > This can break pre-build upgrades in sbuild when the schroot is of > overlayfs type. > -- System Information: > Debian Release: stretch/sid > APT prefers unstable-debug > APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, > 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Thanks, Guillem
Bug#836211: dpkg: Cannot upgrade some packages on overlayfs: Invalid cross-device link
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 03:03:54PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 14:30:58 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > You are the first to report that this quirk actually causes problems > > in real life. > > > > I have plans to fix this by adding a "redirector" attribute so that > > copied up directories (and perhaps files) can refer to lower directory > > that is found at a different location relative to the root of the > > overlay from the location of the upper directory. > > > > Maybe an example can make this more clear: > > > > lower/foo/bar/baz > > upper/foo/bar <- whiteout > > upper/moved/here <- redirects to "foo/bar" > > > > will result in the tree: > > > > overlay/moved/here/baz > > That'd be very much appreciated, thanks! Toy patch attached. Passes minimal test. It does not deal with multi-layer setups when one of the lower layers was previously an upper layer (generally overlayfs does support this, so this patch will need to deal with that case). You can help by - review it - improve it - test it - break it - write test cases in xfstests Thanks, Miklos --- fs/overlayfs/dir.c | 42 -- fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h |1 fs/overlayfs/super.c | 89 +-- 3 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) --- a/fs/overlayfs/dir.c +++ b/fs/overlayfs/dir.c @@ -764,6 +764,31 @@ static int ovl_rmdir(struct inode *dir, return ovl_do_remove(dentry, true); } +static bool ovl_can_move(struct dentry *dentry, enum ovl_path_type type) +{ +// return !d_is_dir(dentry) || !OVL_TYPE_MERGE_OR_LOWER(type); + return true; +} + +static int ovl_set_redirect(struct dentry *dentry) +{ + char *buf = __getname(); + char *path; + int err; + + if (!buf) + return -ENOMEM; + + path = dentry_path_raw(dentry, buf, PATH_MAX); + + printk(KERN_WARNING "redirect: <%s>\n", path); + err = ovl_do_setxattr(ovl_dentry_upper(dentry), OVL_XATTR_REDIRECT, + path, strlen(path), 0); + __putname(buf); + + return err; +} + static int ovl_rename2(struct inode *olddir, struct dentry *old, struct inode *newdir, struct dentry *new, unsigned int flags) @@ -798,7 +823,7 @@ static int ovl_rename2(struct inode *old /* Don't copy up directory trees */ old_type = ovl_path_type(old); err = -EXDEV; - if (OVL_TYPE_MERGE_OR_LOWER(old_type) && is_dir) + if (!ovl_can_move(old, old_type)) goto out; if (new->d_inode) { @@ -811,7 +836,7 @@ static int ovl_rename2(struct inode *old new_type = ovl_path_type(new); err = -EXDEV; - if (!overwrite && OVL_TYPE_MERGE_OR_LOWER(new_type) && new_is_dir) + if (!overwrite && !ovl_can_move(new, new_type)) goto out; err = 0; @@ -883,7 +908,6 @@ static int ovl_rename2(struct inode *old trap = lock_rename(new_upperdir, old_upperdir); - olddentry = lookup_one_len(old->d_name.name, old_upperdir, old->d_name.len); err = PTR_ERR(olddentry); @@ -920,11 +944,23 @@ static int ovl_rename2(struct inode *old if (newdentry == trap) goto out_dput; + printk(KERN_WARNING "is_dir: %i, old_opaque: %i, old_type: %i\n", + is_dir, old_opaque, old_type); + if (is_dir && OVL_TYPE_MERGE_OR_LOWER(old_type)) { + err = ovl_set_redirect(old); + if (err) + goto out_dput; + } if (is_dir && !old_opaque && new_opaque) { err = ovl_set_opaque(olddentry); if (err) goto out_dput; } + if (!overwrite && new_is_dir && OVL_TYPE_MERGE_OR_LOWER(new_type)) { + err = ovl_set_redirect(new); + if (err) + goto out_dput; + } if (!overwrite && new_is_dir && old_opaque && !new_opaque) { err = ovl_set_opaque(newdentry); if (err) --- a/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h +++ b/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ enum ovl_path_type { #define OVL_XATTR_PREFIX XATTR_TRUSTED_PREFIX "overlay." #define OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE OVL_XATTR_PREFIX "opaque" +#define OVL_XATTR_REDIRECT OVL_XATTR_PREFIX "redirect" #define OVL_ISUPPER_MASK 1UL --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c @@ -285,6 +285,33 @@ static bool ovl_is_opaquedir(struct dent return false; } +static int ovl_check_redirect(struct dentry *dentry, char **bufp) +{ + struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode; + int res; + + if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) || !inode->i_op->getxattr) + return false; + + res = inode->i_op->getxattr(dentry, inode, OVL_XATTR_REDIRECT, NULL, 0); + if (res > 0) { +
Bug#836211: dpkg: Cannot upgrade some packages on overlayfs: Invalid cross-device link
Hi, On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Felipe Sateler wrote: > I don't know what the correct workaround should be. Just for the record, the attached patch is what we use in Kali to work-around this problem. It works but it's not going to be merged in Debian because we really want a fix at the overlayfs level instead (and this is just a hack relying on "mv" to copy the whole-directory). I post it just in case other derivatives have a similar need. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/ commit 237e415129217670699d81287c7cab7bdf451ca7 Author: Raphaël HertzogDate: Fri Sep 2 13:55:29 2016 +0200 Fallback on /bin/mv when rename syscall fails with EXDEV Work-around EXDEV error returned by overlayfs when trying to move away a directory by calling "mv" which will do a full copy of the tree followed by a removal of the source tree. Closes: #836211 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 695c55d..233e413 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +dpkg (1.18.10kali1) kali-dev; urgency=medium + + * Work-around EXDEV error returned by overlayfs when trying to move +away a directory by calling "mv" which will do a full copy of +the tree followed by a removal of the source tree. Closes: #836211 + + -- Raphaël Hertzog Fri, 02 Sep 2016 13:53:39 +0200 + dpkg (1.18.10) unstable; urgency=medium [ Guillem Jover ] diff --git a/src/archives.c b/src/archives.c index d07d4a4..da43ab7 100644 --- a/src/archives.c +++ b/src/archives.c @@ -1021,9 +1021,25 @@ tarobject(void *ctx, struct tar_entry *ti) /* One of the two is a directory - can't do atomic install. */ debug(dbg_eachfiledetail,"tarobject directory, nonatomic"); nifd->namenode->flags |= fnnf_no_atomic_overwrite; - if (rename(fnamevb.buf,fnametmpvb.buf)) -ohshite(_("unable to move aside '%.255s' to install new version"), -ti->name); + if (rename(fnamevb.buf,fnametmpvb.buf)) { + if (errno == EXDEV) { + struct command cmd; + pid_t pid; + + command_init(, "mv", "move directory aside"); + command_add_args(, "mv", fnamevb.buf, fnametmpvb.buf, NULL); + pid = subproc_fork(); + + if (pid == 0) +command_exec(); + + subproc_reap(pid, "mv", 0); + command_destroy(); + } else { + ohshite(_("unable to move aside '%.255s' to install new version"), + ti->name); + } + } } else if (S_ISLNK(stab.st_mode)) { /* We can't make a symlink with two hardlinks, so we'll have to * copy it. (Pretend that making a copy of a symlink is the same
Bug#836211: dpkg: Cannot upgrade some packages on overlayfs: Invalid cross-device link
Hi! On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 14:30:58 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > You are the first to report that this quirk actually causes problems > in real life. > > I have plans to fix this by adding a "redirector" attribute so that > copied up directories (and perhaps files) can refer to lower directory > that is found at a different location relative to the root of the > overlay from the location of the upper directory. > > Maybe an example can make this more clear: > > lower/foo/bar/baz > upper/foo/bar <- whiteout > upper/moved/here <- redirects to "foo/bar" > > will result in the tree: > > overlay/moved/here/baz That'd be very much appreciated, thanks! > > It does not seem very correct to put the burden on user-space to be aware > > of overlayfs restrictions such as this one. Renaming a directory is > > not something that happens often in practice in the uses cases where > > we use overlayfs but it's still frequent enough to deserve better than > > a EXDEV error IMO and dpkg trying to rename "foo/" into "foo.dpkg-tmp/" > > is in its right to assume that this rename will not cross any device > > boundary. > > The EXDEV trick just works for mv(1), hence this didn't seem to be a > big issue in practice. In dpkg, the directory is rename(2)d to perform an atomic temporary backup, so that it can be rolled-back in case of errors during unpacking. Having to possibly do a deep-copy and a deep-remove, and then trying to recover from errors inbetween those, would be very unsatisfactory. Thanks, Guillem
Bug#836211: dpkg: Cannot upgrade some packages on overlayfs: Invalid cross-device link
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Raphael Hertzogwrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> overlayfs does not support renaming directories when the directories >> live in the lower filesystem: > [...] >> Unfortunately this means that dpkg fails at least in the case where a >> directory is converted into a file: apt 1.3~rc2 moves >> /usr/share/bug/apt/script to /usr/share/bug/apt . This causes dpkg to > > That's the change at the package level. The operation that fails > at the dpkg level is rename('/usr/share/bug/apt', > '/usr/share/bug/apt.dpkg-tmp'). > >> fail when running in an overlayfs with the following error: > [...] >> unable to move aside './usr/share/bug/apt' to install new version: Invalid >> cross-device link > > I got the same failure here but I also saw similar reports in a Kali live > system where overlayfs is used for persistence (and with the upgrade > of gedit). So that error is affecting many Kali users. It's not a > very rare error (ex: https://bugs.kali.org/view.php?id=3473, > https://bugs.kali.org/view.php?id=3476, > https://bugs.kali.org/view.php?id=3361, > https://bugs.kali.org/view.php?id=3365). > > I'm putting in copy the overlayfs kernel maintainer... Hello Miklos, > that restriction above (cf > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v4.8-rc2/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c#L318-L322) > is very problematic for us. > > Do you have plans to get rid of it? You are the first to report that this quirk actually causes problems in real life. I have plans to fix this by adding a "redirector" attribute so that copied up directories (and perhaps files) can refer to lower directory that is found at a different location relative to the root of the overlay from the location of the upper directory. Maybe an example can make this more clear: lower/foo/bar/baz upper/foo/bar <- whiteout upper/moved/here <- redirects to "foo/bar" will result in the tree: overlay/moved/here/baz > It does not seem very correct to put the burden on user-space to be aware > of overlayfs restrictions such as this one. Renaming a directory is > not something that happens often in practice in the uses cases where > we use overlayfs but it's still frequent enough to deserve better than > a EXDEV error IMO and dpkg trying to rename "foo/" into "foo.dpkg-tmp/" > is in its right to assume that this rename will not cross any device > boundary. The EXDEV trick just works for mv(1), hence this didn't seem to be a big issue in practice. Thanks, Miklos
Bug#836211: dpkg: Cannot upgrade some packages on overlayfs: Invalid cross-device link
Hi, On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Felipe Sateler wrote: > overlayfs does not support renaming directories when the directories > live in the lower filesystem: [...] > Unfortunately this means that dpkg fails at least in the case where a > directory is converted into a file: apt 1.3~rc2 moves > /usr/share/bug/apt/script to /usr/share/bug/apt . This causes dpkg to That's the change at the package level. The operation that fails at the dpkg level is rename('/usr/share/bug/apt', '/usr/share/bug/apt.dpkg-tmp'). > fail when running in an overlayfs with the following error: [...] > unable to move aside './usr/share/bug/apt' to install new version: Invalid > cross-device link I got the same failure here but I also saw similar reports in a Kali live system where overlayfs is used for persistence (and with the upgrade of gedit). So that error is affecting many Kali users. It's not a very rare error (ex: https://bugs.kali.org/view.php?id=3473, https://bugs.kali.org/view.php?id=3476, https://bugs.kali.org/view.php?id=3361, https://bugs.kali.org/view.php?id=3365). I'm putting in copy the overlayfs kernel maintainer... Hello Miklos, that restriction above (cf https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v4.8-rc2/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c#L318-L322) is very problematic for us. Do you have plans to get rid of it? It does not seem very correct to put the burden on user-space to be aware of overlayfs restrictions such as this one. Renaming a directory is not something that happens often in practice in the uses cases where we use overlayfs but it's still frequent enough to deserve better than a EXDEV error IMO and dpkg trying to rename "foo/" into "foo.dpkg-tmp/" is in its right to assume that this rename will not cross any device boundary. I'm happy to test out kernel patches if I can help you in the process of getting a fix. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/
Bug#836211: dpkg: Cannot upgrade some packages on overlayfs: Invalid cross-device link
On 1 Sep 2016 3:59 a.m., "Johannes Schauer"wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:16:10 -0300 Felipe Sateler wrote: > > overlayfs does not support renaming directories when the directories > > live in the lower filesystem: > > > > * Directory renames only allowed on "pure upper" (already created on > > * upper filesystem, never copied up). Directories which are on lower or > > * are merged may not be renamed. For these -EXDEV is returned and > > * userspace has to deal with it. This means, when copying up a > > * directory we can rely on it and ancestors being stable. > > > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v4.8-rc2/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c#L318-L322 > > > > Unfortunately this means that dpkg fails at least in the case where a > > directory is converted into a file: apt 1.3~rc2 moves > > /usr/share/bug/apt/script to /usr/share/bug/apt . This causes dpkg to > > fail when running in an overlayfs with the following error: > > > > # dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb > > (Reading database ... 11401 files and directories currently installed.) > > Preparing to unpack .../archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb ... > > Unpacking apt (1.3~rc3) over (1.3~rc2) ... > > dpkg: error processing archive > > /var/cache/apt/archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb (--install): > > unable to move aside './usr/share/bug/apt' to install new version: Invalid cross-device link > > dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) > > Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.23-5) ... > > Errors were encountered while processing: > > /var/cache/apt/archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb > > > > I don't know what the correct workaround should be. > > > > This can break pre-build upgrades in sbuild when the schroot is of > > overlayfs type. > > thanks for the analysis! > > I just stumbled across the exact same problem with sbuild in a directory type > overlayfs schroot. My workaround: destroy the chroot (you can now use > sbuild-destroychroot) and then recreate it with sbuild-createchroot. :( You can also enter the source chroot and upgrade there, as that skips the overlayfs setup. I used sbuild-update and it worked OK. I discussed this with Guillem on IRC and he doesn't think adding workarounds for this is reasonable, and this should be fixed in overlayfs. Assuming a directory lives in the same device as itself seems reasonable to me, and overlayfs should try hard to pretend it does. Saludos
Bug#836211: dpkg: Cannot upgrade some packages on overlayfs: Invalid cross-device link
Hi, On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:16:10 -0300 Felipe Satelerwrote: > overlayfs does not support renaming directories when the directories > live in the lower filesystem: > > * Directory renames only allowed on "pure upper" (already created on > * upper filesystem, never copied up). Directories which are on lower or > * are merged may not be renamed. For these -EXDEV is returned and > * userspace has to deal with it. This means, when copying up a > * directory we can rely on it and ancestors being stable. > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v4.8-rc2/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c#L318-L322 > > Unfortunately this means that dpkg fails at least in the case where a > directory is converted into a file: apt 1.3~rc2 moves > /usr/share/bug/apt/script to /usr/share/bug/apt . This causes dpkg to > fail when running in an overlayfs with the following error: > > # dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb > (Reading database ... 11401 files and directories currently installed.) > Preparing to unpack .../archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb ... > Unpacking apt (1.3~rc3) over (1.3~rc2) ... > dpkg: error processing archive > /var/cache/apt/archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb (--install): > unable to move aside './usr/share/bug/apt' to install new version: Invalid > cross-device link > dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) > Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.23-5) ... > Errors were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb > > I don't know what the correct workaround should be. > > This can break pre-build upgrades in sbuild when the schroot is of > overlayfs type. thanks for the analysis! I just stumbled across the exact same problem with sbuild in a directory type overlayfs schroot. My workaround: destroy the chroot (you can now use sbuild-destroychroot) and then recreate it with sbuild-createchroot. :( cheers, josch signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#836211: dpkg: Cannot upgrade some packages on overlayfs: Invalid cross-device link
Package: dpkg Version: 1.18.10 Severity: normal Hi, overlayfs does not support renaming directories when the directories live in the lower filesystem: * Directory renames only allowed on "pure upper" (already created on * upper filesystem, never copied up). Directories which are on lower or * are merged may not be renamed. For these -EXDEV is returned and * userspace has to deal with it. This means, when copying up a * directory we can rely on it and ancestors being stable. https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v4.8-rc2/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c#L318-L322 Unfortunately this means that dpkg fails at least in the case where a directory is converted into a file: apt 1.3~rc2 moves /usr/share/bug/apt/script to /usr/share/bug/apt . This causes dpkg to fail when running in an overlayfs with the following error: # dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb (Reading database ... 11401 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb ... Unpacking apt (1.3~rc3) over (1.3~rc2) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb (--install): unable to move aside './usr/share/bug/apt' to install new version: Invalid cross-device link dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.23-5) ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb I don't know what the correct workaround should be. This can break pre-build upgrades in sbuild when the schroot is of overlayfs type. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages dpkg depends on: ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.6-8 ii libc62.23-5 ii liblzma5 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2.1 ii libselinux1 2.5-3 ii tar 1.29b-1 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1 dpkg recommends no packages. Versions of packages dpkg suggests: ii apt 1.3~rc3 -- no debconf information