On 20.09.2016 16:06, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 19/09/16 22:00, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>> On 18.09.2016 22:40, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>>> Thank you. Turned out it is reproducible in release build (at the least on
>>> armel porterbox), but not in debug build.
>>>
>>> I'll look into
On 19/09/16 22:00, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> On 18.09.2016 22:40, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>> Thank you. Turned out it is reproducible in release build (at the least on
>> armel porterbox), but not in debug build.
>>
>> I'll look into it.
>
> Ok, something fishy is going on with lambda captu
On 18.09.2016 22:40, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Thank you. Turned out it is reproducible in release build (at the least on
> armel porterbox), but not in debug build.
>
> I'll look into it.
Ok, something fishy is going on with lambda captures. I believe I found an
issue in either std::functio
Control: -1 tags - unreproducible
On 18.09.2016 17:37, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> I cannot reproduce the issue (that is, on the armhf porterbox harris.d.o the
>> test suit passes). Any chance that at the
>> time of the build some toolchain packages were in an inconsistent shape or
>> had k
4 matches
Mail list logo
