Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-12-10 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:22:50PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Am 06.10.2016 um 22:20 tastete Mattia Rizzolo: > >On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 06:55:22PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > >9) now that you're like this you can reinstate hardening, that you > > removed but not replaced, so just put > >

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-12-07 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 06.10.2016 um 22:20 tastete Mattia Rizzolo: On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 06:55:22PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi, I'm not a DD (yet), I can't do upload. I know we have DD's on that list: could anybody finalize the changelog in git and then upload the current git state? I can sponsor the

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-11-28 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 06.10.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: Hi, 13) the -l option of dh_shlibdeps is really unneeded nowadays dh_shlibdeps - calculate shared library dependencies -ldirectory[:directory ...] With recent versions of dpkg-shlibdeps, this option is generally not needed.

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-10-28 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 06.10.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: Hi, 11) the rules' clean target doesn't call dh_auto_clean. I think that with it you can save a lot of manual `rm -rf` and also revert adf6a7e88b051ed2fa7e7638d41d9105aa3c603c Replaced clean target. That doesn't make the manual `rm -rf`

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-10-27 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 27.10.16 Mattia Rizzolo (mat...@debian.org) wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 02:07:17PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi, > > Sorry to bother you again. The generated configure script seems to be broken > > or incomplete: > > arggg :( > #842293, I've set you as submitter. > IMHO, this should

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-10-27 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 02:07:17PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Sorry to bother you again. The generated configure script seems to be broken > or incomplete: arggg :( > Should we open a new bug for all this? IMHO yes. > > > I suggest you bring that upstream, not being able to run > >

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-10-27 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 27.10.2016 um 01:58 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:56:12PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi, Tried to implement this according to [1]. I gave me an FTBFS (log attached). That's configure.in being buggy. I quickly asked to a friend of mine (jrtc27) whom speaks

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-10-26 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:56:12PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Am 06.10.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: > > Hi, > > > I can sponsor the upload if you want, but before I'd like to see more > > changes done, meaning: > > > > 6) run dh_autoreconf > > > Tried to implement this according to

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-10-26 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 06.10.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: Hi, I can sponsor the upload if you want, but before I'd like to see more changes done, meaning: 6) run dh_autoreconf Tried to implement this according to [1]. I gave me an FTBFS (log attached). Not sure if I did the steps in wrong order, but

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-10-25 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:35:42PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > > 3) configure done by dh_auto_configure > > > I'd simply replace > > ./configure $(shell dpkg-buildflags --export=configure) $(CONF_ARGS) > --with-shared=$(DSOMODS1)$(DSOMODS2)$(DSOMODS3)$(DSOMODS4) > > by > > dh_auto_configure

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-10-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 06.10.2016 22:20, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Hi, > I can sponsor the upload if you want, but before I'd like to see more > changes done, meaning: > > > 3) configure done by dh_auto_configure > I'd simply replace ./configure $(shell dpkg-buildflags --export=configure) $(CONF_ARGS)

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-10-06 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 06.10.2016 22:20, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Hi Mattia, > I can sponsor the upload if you want, but before I'd like to see > more changes done, meaning: > Many thanks for the offer! I'm aware that the d/rules file is rather a mess and we do a lot of work which could by upstream or dh. However I'm

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-10-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 06:55:22PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > On 01.10.2016 19:01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Can you also upload it? > I'm not a DD (yet), I can't do upload. > > I know we have DD's on that list: could anybody finalize the changelog > in git and then upload the current git

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-10-06 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 01.10.2016 19:01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:44:21PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: >> On 19.09.2016 19:29, Niels Thykier wrote: >>> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:36:20 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi Mattia, Is it OK to simply remove that check? Is there an

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-10-01 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:44:21PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > On 19.09.2016 19:29, Niels Thykier wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:36:20 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > Hi, > > >> Is it OK to simply remove that check? Is there an replacement for > >> hardening-check? > >> > >

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-09-19 Thread Niels Thykier
Hilmar Preuße: > tags 836759 + pending > stop > > On 19.09.2016 19:29, Niels Thykier wrote: >> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:36:20 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > Hi, > >>> Is it OK to simply remove that check? Is there an replacement for >>> hardening-check? >>> >> Hi Hilmar :) >> >>

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-09-19 Thread Hilmar Preuße
tags 836759 + pending stop On 19.09.2016 19:29, Niels Thykier wrote: > On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:36:20 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, >> Is it OK to simply remove that check? Is there an replacement for >> hardening-check? >> > Hi Hilmar :) > > I believe you can just remove that

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-09-19 Thread Niels Thykier
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:36:20 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: > On 05.09.16 Matthias Klose (d...@debian.org) wrote: > > Hi Matthias, > > > [...] > Is it OK to simply remove that check? Is there an replacement for > hardening-check? > > Thanks, > Hilmar > > [1] >

Bug#836759: proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

2016-09-17 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 05.09.16 Matthias Klose (d...@debian.org) wrote: Hi Matthias, > This package builds using the hardening-includes package, which > is now replaced by dpkg-dev's DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS settings. > > Please consider dropping the build dependency of hardening-includes > and use the