Bug#838109: release.debian.org: binNMU for ccache/amd64 to rebuild against stable
Hi, On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 00:03:17 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > Control: tags -1 + pending > > On Sat, 2016-09-17 at 13:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Whilst performing some checks during today's point release, we noticed > > that a new "ccache-dbgsym" binary package appeared on amd64. Neither the > > debhelper version in stable nor stable-backports will generate such > > packages, implying that the upload was built in another, or unclean, > > environment. > > I scheduled the binNMU, and it's now in proposed-updates. (Since I also just noticed this package) Should the ccache-dbgsym package now be removed from stable? Thanks, James signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#838109: release.debian.org: binNMU for ccache/amd64 to rebuild against stable
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 2016-09-17 at 13:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Whilst performing some checks during today's point release, we noticed > that a new "ccache-dbgsym" binary package appeared on amd64. Neither the > debhelper version in stable nor stable-backports will generate such > packages, implying that the upload was built in another, or unclean, > environment. I scheduled the binNMU, and it's now in proposed-updates. Regards, Adam
Bug#838109: release.debian.org: binNMU for ccache/amd64 to rebuild against stable
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu X-Debbugs-CC: Joel Rosdahl Whilst performing some checks during today's point release, we noticed that a new "ccache-dbgsym" binary package appeared on amd64. Neither the debhelper version in stable nor stable-backports will generate such packages, implying that the upload was built in another, or unclean, environment. Regards, Adam
