Bug#838234: transition: readline/readline6
On 13/10/16 20:10, Pino Toscano wrote: > Hi, > > In data martedì 11 ottobre 2016 00:14:35 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha > scritto: >> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> >> On 03/10/16 00:10, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> Control: forwarded -1 >>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/readline7.html >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 18/09/16 20:43, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition readline 7.0 is now released, changing the soversion. The idea is to upload the readline package from experimental (plus providing the libreadline*6-dev packages), and stop building the -dev packages and common packages from readline6. Afaics, the API didn't change; for rebuild tests I only see build failures for unrelated reasons. readline and readline6 can stay in testing for some time, but readline6 should be removed from testing before the stretch release. I haven't done a test rebuild on unstable, but building on Ubuntu yakkety. The current state of the transition can be seen at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/readline.html >>> >>> Sounds good. I'd prefer to see a test rebuild on sid, but I think we could >>> go >>> ahead with this as it's a separate source and shouldn't block anything. >> >> readline 6 got decrufted. Rebuilds scheduled. > > Please adjust the tracker to consider also Pre-Depends on libreadline6: > gawk has Pre-Depends instead of Depends, and there's libreadline6 there. > As consequence, please also schedule the binNMU of gawk for this > transition. Done, and scheduled. Cheers, Emilio
Bug#838234: transition: readline/readline6
Hi, In data martedì 11 ottobre 2016 00:14:35 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 03/10/16 00:10, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > Control: forwarded -1 > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/readline7.html > > > > Hi, > > > > On 18/09/16 20:43, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> Package: release.debian.org > >> Severity: normal > >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > >> Usertags: transition > >> > >> readline 7.0 is now released, changing the soversion. The idea is to > >> upload the > >> readline package from experimental (plus providing the libreadline*6-dev > >> packages), and stop building the -dev packages and common packages from > >> readline6. Afaics, the API didn't change; for rebuild tests I only see > >> build > >> failures for unrelated reasons. readline and readline6 can stay in > >> testing for > >> some time, but readline6 should be removed from testing before the stretch > >> release. > >> > >> I haven't done a test rebuild on unstable, but building on Ubuntu yakkety. > >> The > >> current state of the transition can be seen at > >> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/readline.html > > > > Sounds good. I'd prefer to see a test rebuild on sid, but I think we could > > go > > ahead with this as it's a separate source and shouldn't block anything. > > readline 6 got decrufted. Rebuilds scheduled. Please adjust the tracker to consider also Pre-Depends on libreadline6: gawk has Pre-Depends instead of Depends, and there's libreadline6 there. As consequence, please also schedule the binNMU of gawk for this transition. Thanks, -- Pino Toscano signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#838234: transition: readline/readline6
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 03/10/16 00:10, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/readline7.html > > Hi, > > On 18/09/16 20:43, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: transition >> >> readline 7.0 is now released, changing the soversion. The idea is to upload >> the >> readline package from experimental (plus providing the libreadline*6-dev >> packages), and stop building the -dev packages and common packages from >> readline6. Afaics, the API didn't change; for rebuild tests I only see build >> failures for unrelated reasons. readline and readline6 can stay in testing >> for >> some time, but readline6 should be removed from testing before the stretch >> release. >> >> I haven't done a test rebuild on unstable, but building on Ubuntu yakkety. >> The >> current state of the transition can be seen at >> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/readline.html > > Sounds good. I'd prefer to see a test rebuild on sid, but I think we could go > ahead with this as it's a separate source and shouldn't block anything. readline 6 got decrufted. Rebuilds scheduled. Cheers, Emilio
Bug#838234: transition: readline/readline6
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/readline7.html Hi, On 18/09/16 20:43, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > readline 7.0 is now released, changing the soversion. The idea is to upload > the > readline package from experimental (plus providing the libreadline*6-dev > packages), and stop building the -dev packages and common packages from > readline6. Afaics, the API didn't change; for rebuild tests I only see build > failures for unrelated reasons. readline and readline6 can stay in testing > for > some time, but readline6 should be removed from testing before the stretch > release. > > I haven't done a test rebuild on unstable, but building on Ubuntu yakkety. The > current state of the transition can be seen at > http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/readline.html Sounds good. I'd prefer to see a test rebuild on sid, but I think we could go ahead with this as it's a separate source and shouldn't block anything. Cheers, Emilio
Bug#838234: transition: readline/readline6
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition readline 7.0 is now released, changing the soversion. The idea is to upload the readline package from experimental (plus providing the libreadline*6-dev packages), and stop building the -dev packages and common packages from readline6. Afaics, the API didn't change; for rebuild tests I only see build failures for unrelated reasons. readline and readline6 can stay in testing for some time, but readline6 should be removed from testing before the stretch release. I haven't done a test rebuild on unstable, but building on Ubuntu yakkety. The current state of the transition can be seen at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/readline.html
