Hi,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:11:10AM +0100, Simon John wrote:
> Regarding the version info, I didn't realise it was ok/possible to put
> two versions in the tag, but I put it in the text anyway. Maybe file it
> as a bug to the reportbug maintainers?
The point is that you should not add two vers
On 21/09/16 06:40, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> tag 838418 + moreinfo
> thanks
[snip]
> Especially as end of August we got Gtk 3.0 3.21.x What happens if you
> downgrade
> that one to 3.20.9? (see snapshot.debian.org?
>
> Regards,
>
> Rene
I tried reverting to libgtk-3-0_3.20.9-1_amd64.deb and i
tag 838418 + moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 07:37:11AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Upgrade of libreoffice. It was definitely working fine on August 16th,
> > then I haven't done any upgrades until this last week, so I suspect the
> > move from 5.2.0 to 5.2.1
>
> I will never underst
found 838418 1:5.2.1-1
thanks
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:25:58PM +0100, Simon John wrote:
> Package: libreoffice-gtk3
> Version: 1:5.2.1-3
Obviously wrrong. Because you say below that 1:5.2.1-1 has the same problem.
So please take some care on reporting bugs, especially if it's RC and your
bug w
Package: libreoffice-gtk3
Version: 1:5.2.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Upgrade of libreoffice. It was definitely working fine on August 16th,
then I haven't done any upgrades until this last week, so I suspect the
5 matches
Mail list logo
