Bug#839991: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#839991: gnupg-agent: 'allow-emacs-pinentry' setting in agent conf makes gpg2 respond no secret key

2016-10-19 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 22:36, d...@fifthhorseman.net said: > So a pinentry implementation is expected to say something other than > "GPG_ERR_UNKNOWN_OPTION" when it sees an option it recognizes, but knows > it will have no way of implementing. is that right? That seems to be That depends on

Bug#839991: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#839991: gnupg-agent: 'allow-emacs-pinentry' setting in agent conf makes gpg2 respond no secret key

2016-10-12 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
Daniel Kahn Gillmor čálii: [...] >> Alrthough we could handle this in gpg-agent, I consider it better to fix >> this in Pinentry. The name "allow-emacs-prompt" means to me that Emacs >> support is optional and thus Pinentry should just return OK. A new >> Pinentry

Bug#839991: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#839991: gnupg-agent: 'allow-emacs-pinentry' setting in agent conf makes gpg2 respond no secret key

2016-10-11 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Control: reassign 839991 pinentry Control: affects 839991 + gpg-agent Control: found 839991 0.9.7-5 Control: fixed 839991 0.9.7-6 On Sat 2016-10-08 04:56:52 -0400, Werner Koch wrote: > bail out on this error because the Pinentry told us that it knows about > the option. So it was a Pinentry

Bug#839991: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#839991: gnupg-agent: 'allow-emacs-pinentry' setting in agent conf makes gpg2 respond no secret key

2016-10-11 Thread Justus Winter
Daiki Ueno writes: > Werner Koch writes: > >> Alrthough we could handle this in gpg-agent, I consider it better to fix >> this in Pinentry. The name "allow-emacs-prompt" means to me that Emacs >> support is optional and thus Pinentry should just return OK. A new

Bug#839991: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#839991: gnupg-agent: 'allow-emacs-pinentry' setting in agent conf makes gpg2 respond no secret key

2016-10-10 Thread Werner Koch
On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:39, u...@gnu.org said: > That makes sense. How about this trivial patch? Fine. Justus, can you please apply it? Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. pgpUGWaP6ONgY.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#839991: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#839991: gnupg-agent: 'allow-emacs-pinentry' setting in agent conf makes gpg2 respond no secret key

2016-10-10 Thread Daiki Ueno
Werner Koch writes: > Alrthough we could handle this in gpg-agent, I consider it better to fix > this in Pinentry. The name "allow-emacs-prompt" means to me that Emacs > support is optional and thus Pinentry should just return OK. A new > Pinentry version is anyway due. That

Bug#839991: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#839991: gnupg-agent: 'allow-emacs-pinentry' setting in agent conf makes gpg2 respond no secret key

2016-10-08 Thread Werner Koch
Hi! [CCing Ueno-san as Emacs Pinentry author] On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 22:52, d...@fifthhorseman.net said: > Oct 07 16:39:10 alice gpg-agent[20025]: DBG: chan_9 <- OK Pleased to meet > you, process 20025 Note to self: We should really print the type and version of the Pinentry here. > Oct 07

Bug#839991: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#839991: gnupg-agent: 'allow-emacs-pinentry' setting in agent conf makes gpg2 respond no secret key

2016-10-07 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Control: found 839991 2.1.15-4 Control: affects 839991 src:pinentry Hi Kevin! (i'm cc'ing the upstream mailing list about this, hope that's OK) On Fri 2016-10-07 03:46:06 -0400, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote: > Package: gnupg-agent > Version: 2.1.11-6ubuntu2 hm, this isn't a debian version