Bug#840122: Incorrect idescription in debian/copyright

2016-10-10 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
Okay, I merged your NMU etc. One question. I didn't understand this: > It seems I should have added symlink in debian/rules as > cd debian/fossil/usr/share/bash-completion/completions; \ > ln -sf fossil f > to make it work in the first invocation. and couldn't find documentation

Bug#840122: Incorrect idescription in debian/copyright

2016-10-09 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
As one point apparently fossil could use a git repo as its database. There really isn't any particular semantic mismatch. But that code was experimental and isn't in the current main release. I also am a git person. But I cannot really package fossil without doing it in a fossil repo, right?

Bug#840122: Incorrect idescription in debian/copyright

2016-10-09 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:05:14PM +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > Would you like to co-maintain? Thanks. No I am handful. I only worked on low hanging fruits for fossil this time. My patches are available in BTS and my NMU in unstable. It seems I should have added symlink in

Bug#840122: Incorrect idescription in debian/copyright

2016-10-09 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
Would you like to co-maintain? The packaging repo is a fossil repo (of course) see debian/README.Debian so if you do co-maintain you can either make you own and we can sync, or we can try to tickle the linux ACLs on the fossil repo database (it's on a debian server) to give you write access. I'd

Bug#840122: Incorrect idescription in debian/copyright

2016-10-08 Thread Osamu Aoki
Package: fossil Version: 1:1.33-3+b1 Severity: normal The upstream (Sqlite fame) is famous for his preference on BSD over GPL. So when I saw debian/copyright file, it was not just old format but declaring GPL. Wow, this can't be true. I checked the current source which comes with