Bug#840378: #840378: another stable update
Hi, On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:34:05AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On 2016-10-17 1:03, Adam Borowski wrote: > > >I see we have two different stable update attempts for openbox, both > > >versioned 3.5.2-8+deb8u1: > > >* NMU by Salvatore Bonaccorso fixing #808138 > > >* maintainer upload by Mateusz Łukasik fixing #838326 (RFS #841017) > > > > > >I have no opinion about appropriateness of both updates, but as they seem > > >to be independent, combining them is trivial. Could we have a word from > > >the SRMs as to whether both, or any, of these updates would be acked? > > > > If you're more patient, sure. The older of the two requests appears to be > > less than a week old. > > Yeah, my point is to avoid you having to do a full review just to have the > request amended. It'd be nice to hear a preliminary response, in case one > of these bugs is going to be rejected. > > And there's no hurry, it's not like the next point release is tomorrow... > > > >I guess two updates in a single point release would be a bad idea, thus > > >there's a need to coordinate. > > > > Two updates is fine, but would indeed need co-ordination as one would have > > to build on top of the other. > > Ie, no gain over combining them into a single upload. JFTR, I'm perfectly fine if -- in case accepted by the SRM -- my proposed debdiff just get squashed in in Mateusz upload, or if he want's to do the upload. In fact I have X-Debbug-CC'ed on my first request, just in case he would like to take over. We are affected at workplace by the former bug, so I was particularly interested to see that fixed as well in Jessie at some point. Regards, Salvatore
Bug#840378: #840378: another stable update
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:34:05AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2016-10-17 1:03, Adam Borowski wrote: > >I see we have two different stable update attempts for openbox, both > >versioned 3.5.2-8+deb8u1: > >* NMU by Salvatore Bonaccorso fixing #808138 > >* maintainer upload by Mateusz Łukasik fixing #838326 (RFS #841017) > > > >I have no opinion about appropriateness of both updates, but as they seem > >to be independent, combining them is trivial. Could we have a word from > >the SRMs as to whether both, or any, of these updates would be acked? > > If you're more patient, sure. The older of the two requests appears to be > less than a week old. Yeah, my point is to avoid you having to do a full review just to have the request amended. It'd be nice to hear a preliminary response, in case one of these bugs is going to be rejected. And there's no hurry, it's not like the next point release is tomorrow... > >I guess two updates in a single point release would be a bad idea, thus > >there's a need to coordinate. > > Two updates is fine, but would indeed need co-ordination as one would have > to build on top of the other. Ie, no gain over combining them into a single upload. Meow! -- A MAP07 (Dead Simple) raspberry tincture recipe: 0.5l 95% alcohol, 1kg raspberries, 0.4kg sugar; put into a big jar for 1 month. Filter out and throw away the fruits (can dump them into a cake, etc), let the drink age at least 3-6 months.
Bug#840378: #840378: another stable update
On 2016-10-17 1:03, Adam Borowski wrote: Hi guys! I see we have two different stable update attempts for openbox, both versioned 3.5.2-8+deb8u1: * NMU by Salvatore Bonaccorso fixing #808138 * maintainer upload by Mateusz Łukasik fixing #838326 (RFS #841017) I have no opinion about appropriateness of both updates, but as they seem to be independent, combining them is trivial. Could we have a word from the SRMs as to whether both, or any, of these updates would be acked? If you're more patient, sure. The older of the two requests appears to be less than a week old. I guess two updates in a single point release would be a bad idea, thus there's a need to coordinate. Two updates is fine, but would indeed need co-ordination as one would have to build on top of the other. Regards, Adam
Bug#840378: #840378: another stable update
Hi guys! I see we have two different stable update attempts for openbox, both versioned 3.5.2-8+deb8u1: * NMU by Salvatore Bonaccorso fixing #808138 * maintainer upload by Mateusz Łukasik fixing #838326 (RFS #841017) I have no opinion about appropriateness of both updates, but as they seem to be independent, combining them is trivial. Could we have a word from the SRMs as to whether both, or any, of these updates would be acked? I guess two updates in a single point release would be a bad idea, thus there's a need to coordinate. Meow! -- A MAP07 (Dead Simple) raspberry tincture recipe: 0.5l 95% alcohol, 1kg raspberries, 0.4kg sugar; put into a big jar for 1 month. Filter out and throw away the fruits (can dump them into a cake, etc), let the drink age at least 3-6 months.
