Am 17.10.2016 um 19:56 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 17.10.2016 um 19:42 schrieb Jason Crain:
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 07:12:48PM +0200, Sergio Villar Senin wrote:
>>> Yes, it's properly installed 3.22.0. I've just moved to 3.22.1 and it
>>> seems it did the trick.
>>
>> I see that epiphany-browser's depends on epiphany-browser-data needs to
>> be bumped. The new package includes the schema and the previous version
>> doesn't.
>
> We should probably make that a tight dependency like
> Depends: epiphany-browser data (= ${source:Version})An alternative could be, to move the GSettings schema files into the main package, i.e. /usr/share/GConf/gsettings /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas That seems to be the approach used by evince. I'm a bit undecided which approach we should prefer. E.g. gnome-shell(-common), totem(-common), anjuta(-common), brasero(-common), cheese(-common) and many others use the tight dependency approach between the main and -common package. So this scheme seems to be more widely used afaics. I don't have a strong preference either way. I'm slightly leaning towards putting the schema files in the data/common package and having a strict dep. What I think we should have is a consensus within in the team, so we use it consistently. Thoughts, Opinions? -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
