Bug#841096: [Debichem-devel] Bug#841096: espresso: FTBFS (make install fails)

On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 10:43:11PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi Santiago, > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 05:38:43PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > The problem seems to be in the install target of the top-level > > Makefile, which reads like this: > > Thanks a lot for tracking this down, I've

Bug#841096: [Debichem-devel] Bug#841096: espresso: FTBFS (make install fails)

Hi Santiago, On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 05:38:43PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > The problem seems to be in the install target of the top-level > Makefile, which reads like this: Thanks a lot for tracking this down, I've forwarded it upstream and uploaded a new revision with your patch. Does -3

Bug#841096: espresso: FTBFS (make install fails)

Hi Santiago On 9 November 2016 at 18:38, Santiago Vila wrote: > There are severl problems here: > > * The directory "test-suite" should be excluded but it isn't. > > * The output of "find" depends on filesystem ordering, it may be anything. > > * The "cp" commands are

Bug#841096: espresso: FTBFS (make install fails)

Hi. The problem seems to be in the install target of the top-level Makefile, which reads like this: install : touch-dummy @if test -d bin ; then mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)$(bindir) ; \ for x in `find . -path ./test-suite -prune -o -name *.x -type f` ; do \ cp $$x

Bug#841096: espresso: FTBFS (make install fails)

On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 02:55:14PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > Just to be clear: > - the build is always successful on some autobuilders > - the build randomly fails on the other autobuilders > > Is that right? It is actually "better" than that: On the machine where it fails, it always fails

Bug#841096: espresso: FTBFS (make install fails)

Hi Santiago On 9 November 2016 at 13:41, Santiago Vila wrote: > Hi. I have taken a look at the build logs and I have to agree that > downgrading is the only sensible thing to do for now. I'm glad we could agree on that. > I naively thought that this would be easy to reproduce,

Bug#841096: espresso: FTBFS (make install fails)

> I'm lowering the severity of this bug for now. Hi. I have taken a look at the build logs and I have to agree that downgrading is the only sensible thing to do for now. I naively thought that this would be easy to reproduce, but the randomness does not happen in each autobuilder. Instead, the

Bug#841096: espresso: FTBFS (make install fails)

On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 12:05:31PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 17/10/2016 19:25, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Note: It does not always fail for me. > > > > I tried 13 times so far. It failed 11 times. > > It built 3 times in a row for me on amd64. A successful build in your machine does not

Bug#841096: espresso: FTBFS (make install fails)

Control: severity -1 normal Hi Santiago On 17/10/2016 19:25, Santiago Vila wrote: Note: It does not always fail for me. I tried 13 times so far. It failed 11 times. It built 3 times in a row for me on amd64. As you noted, it also built on the buildds, except on ppc64. Version 6.0-2 seems

Bug#841096: espresso: FTBFS (make install fails)

Note: It does not always fail for me. I tried 13 times so far. It failed 11 times. Status: failed espresso_6.0-2_amd64-20161013T061302Z Status: failed espresso_6.0-2_amd64-20161013T152415Z Status: failed espresso_6.0-2_amd64-20161013T152515Z Status: failed

Bug#841096: espresso: FTBFS (make install fails)

Note: A similar failure happened on the ppc64 autobuilder: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=espresso So I guess this is not architecture-related. What kind of bug makes "make install" to fail? A bug in the Makefile? My autobuilder has a single CPU, maybe that's relevant. Thanks.

Bug#841096: espresso: FTBFS (make install fails)

Package: src:espresso Version: 6.0-2 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed: