Bug#870951: evernote-mode: should evernote-mode be removed from unstable?

reassign 870951 ftp.debian.org retitle 870951 RM: evernote-mode -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch, dead upstream thanks Ooops On 10/09/17 at 08:44 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > reassign -1 ftp.debian.org > retitle -1 RM: evernote-mode -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch, dead >

Bug#870951: evernote-mode: should evernote-mode be removed from unstable?

reassign -1 ftp.debian.org retitle -1 RM: evernote-mode -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch, dead upstream thanks Adding Cc control@ On 08/08/17 at 19:58 +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote: > reassign -1 ftp.debian.org > retitle -1 RM: evernote-mode -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch, dead >

Bug#870951: evernote-mode: should evernote-mode be removed from unstable?

reassign -1 ftp.debian.org retitle -1 RM: evernote-mode -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch, dead upstream thanks Unfortunately, this package's upstream is dead. Please remove this package. On Sun, 06 Aug 2017 09:50:12 -0400 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: evernote-mode >

Bug#870951: evernote-mode: should evernote-mode be removed from unstable?

Source: evernote-mode User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch Hi, Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from unstable, because: it was in unstable at the