Bug#871897: transition: directfb
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 05:51:34PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> Does this mean that the directfb transition to testing can now be > >> unblocked? > > > > It has been blocked because of the udeb block due to the ongoing d-i > > release. It > > will be automatically unblocked once the udeb block is lifted, which should > > hopefully happen in the next few days. > > In fact it just happened an hour ago, so directfb should migrate in the next > britney run in a few minutes. Thanks! I didn't realise that this was a current d-i release block - I thought it was one associated with the stretch release. Best wishes, Julian
Bug#871897: transition: directfb
On 03/09/17 17:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 03/09/17 10:20, Julian Gilbey wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 08:19:43PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: >>> On 2017-08-15 19:39:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > libdirectfb bumped its SONAME and needs a transition. The reverse > dependencies > build fine against the new version. qingy however FTBFS for unreleated > reasons > (#817643) Ack. >>> >>> Thanks, uploaded. >>> >>> Cheers >>> -- >>> Sebastian Ramacher >> >> Does this mean that the directfb transition to testing can now be >> unblocked? > > It has been blocked because of the udeb block due to the ongoing d-i release. > It > will be automatically unblocked once the udeb block is lifted, which should > hopefully happen in the next few days. In fact it just happened an hour ago, so directfb should migrate in the next britney run in a few minutes. Emilio
Bug#871897: transition: directfb
On 03/09/17 10:20, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 08:19:43PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: >> On 2017-08-15 19:39:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: libdirectfb bumped its SONAME and needs a transition. The reverse dependencies build fine against the new version. qingy however FTBFS for unreleated reasons (#817643) >>> >>> Ack. >> >> Thanks, uploaded. >> >> Cheers >> -- >> Sebastian Ramacher > > Does this mean that the directfb transition to testing can now be > unblocked? It has been blocked because of the udeb block due to the ongoing d-i release. It will be automatically unblocked once the udeb block is lifted, which should hopefully happen in the next few days. Cheers, Emilio > > erdos:~ $ grep-excuses directfb > directfb (1.2.10.0-9 to 1.7.7-5) > Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers > 18 days old (needed 5 days) > Not touching package due to block-udeb request by freeze (please contact > the d-i release manager if an update is needed) > Piuparts tested OK - > https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/d/directfb.html > > > Thanks, > >Julian >
Bug#871897: transition: directfb
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 08:19:43PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2017-08-15 19:39:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > libdirectfb bumped its SONAME and needs a transition. The reverse > > > dependencies > > > build fine against the new version. qingy however FTBFS for unreleated > > > reasons > > > (#817643) > > > > Ack. > > Thanks, uploaded. > > Cheers > -- > Sebastian Ramacher Does this mean that the directfb transition to testing can now be unblocked? erdos:~ $ grep-excuses directfb directfb (1.2.10.0-9 to 1.7.7-5) Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers 18 days old (needed 5 days) Not touching package due to block-udeb request by freeze (please contact the d-i release manager if an update is needed) Piuparts tested OK - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/d/directfb.html Thanks, Julian
Bug#871897: transition: directfb
On 2017-08-15 19:39:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 12/08/17 11:50, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > libdirectfb bumped its SONAME and needs a transition. The reverse > > dependencies > > build fine against the new version. qingy however FTBFS for unreleated > > reasons > > (#817643) > > Ack. Thanks, uploaded. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#871897: transition: directfb
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 12/08/17 11:50, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > libdirectfb bumped its SONAME and needs a transition. The reverse dependencies > build fine against the new version. qingy however FTBFS for unreleated reasons > (#817643) Ack. Emilio
Bug#871897: transition: directfb
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition libdirectfb bumped its SONAME and needs a transition. The reverse dependencies build fine against the new version. qingy however FTBFS for unreleated reasons (#817643) Cheers Ben file: title = "directfb"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libdirectfb-1.2-9" | .depends ~ "libdirectfb-1.7-7"; is_good = .depends ~ "libdirectfb-1.7-7"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libdirectfb-1.2-9"; -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (650, 'unstable-debug'), (650, 'buildd-unstable'), (650, 'unstable'), (601, 'testing'), (600, 'experimental-debug'), (600, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.11.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
