Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed Done waiting from your side > > On 16/02/18 14:30, roucaries bastien wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:02 PM, roucaries bastien >> wrote: >>> On

Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 16/02/18 14:30, roucaries bastien wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:02 PM, roucaries bastien > wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort >> wrote: >>> Control: retitle -1 transition:

Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:02 PM, roucaries bastien wrote: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> Control: retitle -1 transition: imagemagick >> Control: severity -1 normal >> >> On 24/08/17 17:21, Bastien

Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick

On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: retitle -1 transition: imagemagick > Control: severity -1 normal > > On 24/08/17 17:21, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: important >> >> Hi, >> >> I have just landed an

Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick

Control: retitle -1 transition: imagemagick Control: severity -1 normal On 24/08/17 17:21, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: important > > Hi, > > I have just landed an imagemagick version in experimental, that break the > ABI. > Previous ABI used double_t

Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick

Package: release.debian.org Severity: important Hi, I have just landed an imagemagick version in experimental, that break the ABI. Previous ABI used double_t that is not ABI stable... Could we get a transition of libmagickcore, libmagickwand and libmagick++ I have rebuilded reverse deps a few