Bug#878284: mozjs52: FTBFS on mips: thousands of TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL

2017-10-16 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 at 07:57:45 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > My changes in pkg-gnome git are not believed to be sufficient: in > addition to turning off the JIT, Adrian says we need to fix atomic > operations to not use jit/none/AtomicOperations-none.h. (It isn't > at all clear to me why

Bug#878284: mozjs52: FTBFS on mips: thousands of TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL

2017-10-16 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: severity 878284 serious On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 23:22:27 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > The test failures clearly indicate at least one bug, but it isn't clear > what the severity of that bug is: it could be anything from minor (if > trivial functionality is broken) to RC (if mozjs52 is

Bug#878284: mozjs52: FTBFS on mips: thousands of TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL

2017-10-13 Thread Jeremy Bicha
See also https://bugs.debian.org/878431 (gnome-documents 3.26 FTBFS on mips, configure check error) Thanks, Jeremy Bicha

Bug#878284: mozjs52: FTBFS on mips: thousands of TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL

2017-10-12 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 08:08:42 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 01:31:08 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > I've left mozjs52 > > compiling on mips (minkus) overnight to see whether both big-endian > > 32-bit architectures behave the same. > > Unfortunately mips has new and