control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4547
On 2017-10-13 14:15:13 [+0100], Toni Mueller wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Toni,
> that's also one way to go about it, but while we are at it, can we
> change the "should" to a "must"?
The chapter just vanished. See the pull req.
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 01:16:56PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2017-10-12 14:49:31 [+0100], Toni Mueller wrote:
> > I'm not suggesting a code change, but that the man page be updated to
> > suggest using 2048 bit keys instead.
>
> That is one way to interpret it.
On 2017-10-12 14:49:31 [+0100], Toni Mueller wrote:
> Package: openssl
> Version: 1.1.0f-3
> Severity: normal
> Tags: security upstream
>
>
> Hi,
>
> the genrsa(1) manpage suggests that 1024 bits may be a typical key size
> for RSA keys. I have to object - the Debian project deprecated 1024 bit
Package: openssl
Version: 1.1.0f-3
Severity: normal
Tags: security upstream
Hi,
the genrsa(1) manpage suggests that 1024 bits may be a typical key size
for RSA keys. I have to object - the Debian project deprecated 1024 bit
keys in GnuPG for a reason, and recently, there was also a bug in GnuPG
4 matches
Mail list logo
