Bug#884054: polyml: FTBFS on sh4: MemMgr: Assertion `t->tree[r] == 0' failed.

2017-12-10 Thread James Clarke
On 10 Dec 2017, at 23:06, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 12/11/2017 12:04 AM, James Clarke wrote: >> Yeah, I noticed this back when I was uploading to experimental a few months >> ago. I suspect it's an issue with qemu-user's atomics support on sh4, which >>

Bug#884054: polyml: FTBFS on sh4: MemMgr: Assertion `t->tree[r] == 0' failed.

2017-12-10 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 12/11/2017 12:04 AM, James Clarke wrote: > Yeah, I noticed this back when I was uploading to experimental a few months > ago. I suspect it's an issue with qemu-user's atomics support on sh4, which > have been notoriously unreliable in the past, and asked Adrian to see if he > could reproduce

Bug#884054: polyml: FTBFS on sh4: MemMgr: Assertion `t->tree[r] == 0' failed.

2017-12-10 Thread James Clarke
> On 10 Dec 2017, at 22:09, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > Source: polyml > Version: 5.7.1-1 > Severity: important > Tags: upstream > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > User: debian-sup...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: sh4 > > Builds of

Bug#884054: polyml: FTBFS on sh4: MemMgr: Assertion `t->tree[r] == 0' failed.

2017-12-10 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Source: polyml Version: 5.7.1-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) User: debian-sup...@lists.debian.org Usertags: sh4 Builds of polyml 5.7.x for sh4 (admittedly not a release architecture) have been failing: echo