Bug#886506: busybox sh broken on i386 with glibc 2.26, leads to kernel panic

2018-01-22 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 12:18 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2018-01-21 00:47, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:31:06 +0100 Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> [...] >> > busybox is compiled with -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 on i386 which has >> > the

Bug#886506: busybox sh broken on i386 with glibc 2.26, leads to kernel panic

2018-01-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2018-01-21 at 12:18 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2018-01-21 00:47, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:31:06 +0100 Aurelien Jarno > > wrote: > > [...] > > > busybox is compiled with -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 on i386 which has > > > the same effect

Bug#886506: busybox sh broken on i386 with glibc 2.26, leads to kernel panic

2018-01-21 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2018-01-21 00:47, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:31:06 +0100 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > [...] > > busybox is compiled with -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 on i386 which has > > the same effect of reducing the default stack alignment from 16 bytes to > > 2 bytes.

Bug#886506: busybox sh broken on i386 with glibc 2.26, leads to kernel panic

2018-01-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:31:06 +0100 Aurelien Jarno wrote: [...] > busybox is compiled with -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 on i386 which has > the same effect of reducing the default stack alignment from 16 bytes to > 2 bytes. This comes from arch/i386/Makefile: The argument is

Bug#886506: busybox sh broken on i386 with glibc 2.26, leads to kernel panic

2018-01-19 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Chris Boot wrote: > On 18/01/18 23:44, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Raphael Hertzog (2018-01-17): >>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Aurelien Jarno wrote: busybox is compiled with -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 on i386 which has

Bug#886506: busybox sh broken on i386 with glibc 2.26, leads to kernel panic

2018-01-19 Thread Chris Boot
On 18/01/18 23:44, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Raphael Hertzog (2018-01-17): >> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>> busybox is compiled with -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 on i386 which has >>> the same effect of reducing the default stack alignment from 16 bytes to >>>

Bug#886506: busybox sh broken on i386 with glibc 2.26, leads to kernel panic

2018-01-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Raphael Hertzog (2018-01-17): > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > busybox is compiled with -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 on i386 which has > > the same effect of reducing the default stack alignment from 16 bytes to > > 2 bytes. This comes from arch/i386/Makefile:

Bug#886506: busybox sh broken on i386 with glibc 2.26, leads to kernel panic

2018-01-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > busybox is compiled with -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 on i386 which has > the same effect of reducing the default stack alignment from 16 bytes to > 2 bytes. This comes from arch/i386/Makefile: > > | # -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 is essential

Bug#886506: busybox sh broken on i386 with glibc 2.26, leads to kernel panic

2018-01-17 Thread Aurelien Jarno
control: reassign -1 busybox control: retitle -1 busybox: wrongly compiled with -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 on i386 On 2018-01-17 12:08, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Control: reassign -1 src:glibc 2.26-1 > Control: retitle -1 busybox sh broken on i386 with glibc 2.26, leads to > kernel panic >

Bug#886506: busybox sh broken on i386 with glibc 2.26, leads to kernel panic

2018-01-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Control: reassign -1 src:glibc 2.26-1 Control: retitle -1 busybox sh broken on i386 with glibc 2.26, leads to kernel panic Control: severity -1 serious Control: affects -1 + busybox src:linux Hello, on i386 with glibc 2.26-4, busybox sh is broken: $ busybox sh [...] BusyBox v1.27.2