Bug#888531: transition: ruby2.5 - binNMU round #5, and next steps

2018-03-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 09/03/18 15:53, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Please binNMU:
> 
> obexftp
> ruby-bcrypt-pbkdf
> 
> Now we need to discuss what to do wrt the few pending packages.
> 
> weechat: #892072 [S|+|  ] [src:weechat] weechat: build against ruby2.5

That's got a patch, and should be fixed.

> uwsgi: #892074 [S  |  ] [src:uwsgi] uwsgi: FTBFS with ruby2.5 as default

I gave a clue about this one on the bug. Easy to fix.

> graphviz: is missing on armel, because guile-2.2-dev is missing on armel. I
> asked on #debian-buildd and Julien told me that guile-2.2-dev brings the
> buildds down.

Yeah, this is a problem.

> ruby-prof: I just uploaded an update that will make it build fine on s390x.

Good.

> ruby-pgplot: it's in contrib and has a dependency on a non-free package,
> so it can't be built on buildds. I could do binary uploads myself now,
> or ask someone who cares about it to do that, but then when it's time to
> drop ruby2.3 I would need to do that again, and I would prefer to do it
> just once. I just reported a serious bugs about this.

Already fixed (thanks Andreas!)

> My suggestion would be to remove weechat, uwsgi and ruby-pgplot from
> testing, remove graphviz from testing on armel, and unblock the
> transition. But, of course, this is your call.

No, we should fix weechat and uwsgi. The only real problem is with guile-2.2 on
armel. I'll see what can be done there.

Cheers,
Emilio



Bug#888531: transition: ruby2.5 - binNMU round #5, and next steps

2018-03-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 04:26:03AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 11:53:17 -0300 Antonio Terceiro 
> wrote:
> > ruby-pgplot: it's in contrib and has a dependency on a non-free package,
> > so it can't be built on buildds. I could do binary uploads myself now,
> > or ask someone who cares about it to do that, but then when it's time to
> > drop ruby2.3 I would need to do that again, and I would prefer to do it
> > just once. I just reported a serious bugs about this.
> 
> If you have the infrastructure ready to do contrib/non-free binNMUs (and
> some experience with it), this is not really much work. Uploaded a +b1
> binNMU. Please ping me once you need the ruby2.5-only binNMU.

I have neither the infra ready nor the experience, so thank you lot for
your help with this! :-)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#888531: transition: ruby2.5 - binNMU round #5, and next steps

2018-03-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 11:53:17 -0300 Antonio Terceiro 
wrote:
> ruby-pgplot: it's in contrib and has a dependency on a non-free package,
> so it can't be built on buildds. I could do binary uploads myself now,
> or ask someone who cares about it to do that, but then when it's time to
> drop ruby2.3 I would need to do that again, and I would prefer to do it
> just once. I just reported a serious bugs about this.

If you have the infrastructure ready to do contrib/non-free binNMUs (and
some experience with it), this is not really much work. Uploaded a +b1
binNMU. Please ping me once you need the ruby2.5-only binNMU.


Andreas

PS: I don't care about this particular package, but I do care about a
different non-free/contrib software stack ;-)



Bug#888531: transition: ruby2.5 - binNMU round #5, and next steps

2018-03-09 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi,

Please binNMU:

obexftp
ruby-bcrypt-pbkdf

Now we need to discuss what to do wrt the few pending packages.

weechat: #892072 [S|+|  ] [src:weechat] weechat: build against ruby2.5

uwsgi: #892074 [S  |  ] [src:uwsgi] uwsgi: FTBFS with ruby2.5 as default

graphviz: is missing on armel, because guile-2.2-dev is missing on armel. I
asked on #debian-buildd and Julien told me that guile-2.2-dev brings the
buildds down.

ruby-prof: I just uploaded an update that will make it build fine on s390x.

ruby-pgplot: it's in contrib and has a dependency on a non-free package,
so it can't be built on buildds. I could do binary uploads myself now,
or ask someone who cares about it to do that, but then when it's time to
drop ruby2.3 I would need to do that again, and I would prefer to do it
just once. I just reported a serious bugs about this.

My suggestion would be to remove weechat, uwsgi and ruby-pgplot from
testing, remove graphviz from testing on armel, and unblock the
transition. But, of course, this is your call.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature