Bug#889859: [Debichem-devel] Bug#889859: chemps2: FTBFS on mipsel: test5 segfaults

2018-02-09 Thread Sebastian Wouters
Hi Michael, > Yeah, unfortunately, mipsel is not the most stable architecture. I am > not sure what we should do here, we can either agressively retry to > build on mipsel until all tests pass or alternatively ignore test > failures. I don't think it would be easy to just ignore them on mipsel,

Bug#889859: [Debichem-devel] Bug#889859: chemps2: FTBFS on mipsel: test5 segfaults

2018-02-09 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:26:25AM +0100, Sebastian Wouters wrote: > First one: > > Test project /<>/obj-mipsel-linux-gnu > Start 3: test3 > 1/3 Test #3: test3 Passed8.10 sec > Start 5: test5 > 2/3 Test #5: test5