Hey Sandro,
There has been no feedback on the docstrings in the last 10 months. I'm
sure dumping everything in a large MR was a bad idea to try to get this
going...
So how can we make this more review-friendly?
I'm planning to submit the changes step by step again over the next few
On 20-02-2018 06:02, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 5:03 AM, Nis Martensen wrote:
>> Extending the test suite is actually the goal here. It's just hard to
>> add tests for functions of which you don't know what they're supposed to
>> do exactly. So reading the
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 5:03 AM, Nis Martensen wrote:
> Hey Sandro!
>
> On 18-02-2018 05:49, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Hey Nis!
>>
>>> The reportbug source code has some issues that make it hard to review:
>>
>>
>> thanks for working on this! even if i dont want to mess with
Hey Sandro!
On 18-02-2018 05:49, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hey Nis!
>
>> The reportbug source code has some issues that make it hard to review:
>
>
> thanks for working on this! even if i dont want to mess with your
> plans, let me tell you that if you really want to work on this "qa"
> kind-of
4 matches
Mail list logo