Bug#898934: transition: libmygpo-qt

2018-05-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 29/05/18 21:11, Thomas Pierson wrote: > Hi Emilio, > > This transition seems almost done but clementine can't be built for now > on armel and armhf. So could you please remove clementine armel and > armhf binaries in *testing* to ease the migration of clementine to testing? No, we don't do

Bug#898934: transition: libmygpo-qt

2018-05-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 29/05/18 22:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 29/05/18 21:11, Thomas Pierson wrote: >> Hi Emilio, >> >> This transition seems almost done but clementine can't be built for now >> on armel and armhf. So could you please remove clementine armel and >> armhf binaries in *testing* to ease the

Bug#898934: transition: libmygpo-qt

2018-05-29 Thread Thomas Pierson
Hi Emilio, This transition seems almost done but clementine can't be built for now on armel and armhf. So could you please remove clementine armel and armhf binaries in *testing* to ease the migration of clementine to testing? Thanks, Thomas

Bug#898934: transition: libmygpo-qt

2018-05-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 17/05/18 16:49, cont...@thomaspierson.fr wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Severity: normal > > Hello, > > I uploaded a new version of libmygpo-qt (1.1.0-1) to experimental rebuilt > against

Bug#898934: transition: libmygpo-qt

2018-05-17 Thread contact
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal Hello, I uploaded a new version of libmygpo-qt (1.1.0-1) to experimental rebuilt against Qt5 which introduces ABI changes. I need a transition slot. The transition is already