Bug#903971: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#903971: closed by Mathieu Parent (Re: Bug#903971: ntdb: DoS issues upon offline data corruption, unmaintained upstream)

2018-12-11 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 08:22 +0100, Lionel Debroux wrote: > Hi, > > Four days after this bug report was closed, on > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ntdb , I see no indication that the NTDB > packages were removed from unstable. > This was the main point of this bug report: evicting an unmaintained

Bug#903971: closed by Mathieu Parent (Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#903971: ntdb: DoS issues upon offline data corruption, unmaintained upstream)

2018-12-10 Thread Lionel Debroux
Hi, Four days after this bug report was closed, on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ntdb , I see no indication that the NTDB packages were removed from unstable. This was the main point of this bug report: evicting an unmaintained code base with known (if CVE-less, AFAIK) security issues from the

Bug#903971: ntdb: DoS issues upon offline data corruption, unmaintained upstream

2018-12-06 Thread Douglas Bagnall
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:14:26 +0200 Lionel Debroux wrote: > Source: ntdb > Version: 1.0-9 > Severity: important > Tags: upstream > > Dear maintainers, > > In March, I sent an e-mail to the list, about removing the NTDB > packages because they are unmaintained upstream, As part of the upstream

Bug#903971: ntdb: DoS issues upon offline data corruption, unmaintained upstream

2018-07-17 Thread Lionel Debroux
Source: ntdb Version: 1.0-9 Severity: important Tags: upstream Dear maintainers, In March, I sent an e-mail to the list, about removing the NTDB packages because they are unmaintained upstream, have known security issues (if only DoS), and have no other users in Debian: