On 28/11/2019 11.05, Michael Crusoe wrote:
> Would breaks+replaces libbio-perl-run-perl (<<1.7.3) make sense?
Exactly.
Andreas
Thanks Andreas Beckmann!
Would breaks+replaces libbio-perl-run-perl (<<1.7.3) make sense?
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 12:00 AM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Followup-For: Bug #921495
> Control: found -1 1.7.6-1
>
> libbio-perl-perl is missing proper
> Breaks+Replaces: libbio-perl-run-perl (<< 1.7.3)
Followup-For: Bug #921495
Control: found -1 1.7.6-1
libbio-perl-perl is missing proper
Breaks+Replaces: libbio-perl-run-perl (<< 1.7.3)
There is a typoed (lib?io-perl-run-perl) and wrongly versioned
Breaks: libio-perl-run-perl (<= 1.7.3-1), roary (<= 3.12.0+dfsg-2)
without corresponding Repla
Followup-For: Bug #921495
Control: found -1 1.7.5-1
There is a file overwrite issue upgrading from buster:
Preparing to unpack .../libbio-perl-perl_1.7.5-1_all.deb ...
Unpacking libbio-perl-perl (1.7.5-1) over (1.7.2-3) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/libbio-perl
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:15:21PM +, Carnë Draug wrote:
> > What do you think?
>
> All packages that depend on bioperl are being affected by this. The
> current situation is a bit awkward because packaging and testing in
> sid fails even though it would be fine in testing. This will cause
>
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 15:47, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 03:32:47PM +, Carnë Draug wrote:
> >
> > Well, all those regressions are because they can't install bioperl
> > which is their dependency. There is no issue on themselves or in
> > upstream bioperl. The issue is t
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 03:32:47PM +, Carnë Draug wrote:
>
> Well, all those regressions are because they can't install bioperl
> which is their dependency. There is no issue on themselves or in
> upstream bioperl. The issue is that Debian's bioperl claims to have
> recommend dependency on b
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 14:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi Carnė,
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:59:45PM +, Carnė Draug wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 14:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > This is what I've though about: Removing the files from bioperl-run
> > > (which would be 1.7.2-5 then)
> >
Hi Carnë,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:59:45PM +, Carnë Draug wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 14:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > This is what I've though about: Removing the files from bioperl-run
> > (which would be 1.7.2-5 then)
>
> Upstream has released BioPerl-Run 1.7.3 which fixes this confli
9 matches
Mail list logo