I tried the fix_db.pl script, there was no output. Here is the only
relevant difference:
--- debconf.old/config.dat▸-2019-03-10 18:43:37.265483165 +0100
+++ debconf/config.dat▸-2019-03-10 18:43:41.261085496 +0100
@@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@
Name: libpam-modules/disable-screensaver
Template:
On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 08:25:50PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> [bringing Steve, our pam maintainer, into the loop]
> Hi Steve,
> the following looks like an issue in pam-auth-update and similar to
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923362
> Any idea what might be going wrong
Am 09.03.19 um 22:03 schrieb Julien Leproust:
> Indeed, it looks a lot like #923362, though I can't reproduce now by
> manually running dpkg-reconfigure libpam-runtime.
>
> Tell me if I can help debug this, I still have the full apt logs and
> etckeeper on two machines.
>
Sorry, can't really
Indeed, it looks a lot like #923362, though I can't reproduce now by
manually running dpkg-reconfigure libpam-runtime.
Tell me if I can help debug this, I still have the full apt logs and
etckeeper on two machines.
Anyway I learnt a lot about pam and systemd :-)
Best regards,
--
Julien
[bringing Steve, our pam maintainer, into the loop]
Hi Steve,
the following looks like an issue in pam-auth-update and similar to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923362
Any idea what might be going wrong there?
Am 09.03.19 um 19:55 schrieb Julien Leproust:
> Hi,
>
> Well
Am 09.03.19 um 20:17 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Thanks for the follow-up information.
> That was really helpful.
>
> Am 09.03.19 um 19:55 schrieb Julien Leproust:
>> And then, pam_systemd.so was incorrectly removed? I'm sure you're going
>> to assume I disabled the second option, but I really doubt
Thanks for the follow-up information.
That was really helpful.
Am 09.03.19 um 19:55 schrieb Julien Leproust:
> And then, pam_systemd.so was incorrectly removed? I'm sure you're going
> to assume I disabled the second option, but I really doubt this.
I said, a manual modification is more likely
Hi,
Well we're in luck, I have etckeeper installed since 2012.
On both machines, I never edited /etc/pam.d/common-* manually.
* fc3256a - Sat, 9 Mar 2019 12:59:20 +0100 (7 hours ago) (HEAD -> master)
| daily autocommit - root
* efc0d23 - Thu, 7 Feb 2019 23:16:46 +0100 (4 weeks ago)
|
Am 09.03.19 um 15:00 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 09.03.19 um 14:10 schrieb Julien Leproust:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found the issue.
>>
>> When looking for /etc files not belonging to any package, I discovered
>> that /etc/pam.d/common-* files are managed by pam-auth-update.
>>
>> Most pam profiles were
Am 09.03.19 um 14:10 schrieb Julien Leproust:
> Hi,
>
> I found the issue.
>
> When looking for /etc files not belonging to any package, I discovered
> that /etc/pam.d/common-* files are managed by pam-auth-update.
>
> Most pam profiles were enabled, except "Register user sessions in the
>
Hi,
I found the issue.
When looking for /etc files not belonging to any package, I discovered
that /etc/pam.d/common-* files are managed by pam-auth-update.
Most pam profiles were enabled, except "Register user sessions in the
systemd control group hierarchy", and just enabling it fixed the
On 3/7/19 1:21 AM, Felipe Sateler wrot
It is libpam-ck-connector
I have no such package, neither installed nor available.
--
Julien Leproust
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019, 21:19 Julien Leproust wrote:
> On 3/7/19 1:14 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > It seems yo still have pam ck connector installed. Can you confirm?
>
> I don't know, how do I check this? The only package I find referring
> consolekit is lightdm, in its description.
>
It is
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019, 21:03 Julien Leproust wrote:
> Yes, I do have dbus-user-session and dbus-x11 installed:
>
> $ apt-cache policy dbus-user-session dbus-x11
> dbus-user-session:
>Installed: 1.12.12-1
>Candidate: 1.12.12-1
>Version table:
> 1.13.8-1 1
>1
Yes, I do have dbus-user-session and dbus-x11 installed:
$ apt-cache policy dbus-user-session dbus-x11
dbus-user-session:
Installed: 1.12.12-1
Candidate: 1.12.12-1
Version table:
1.13.8-1 1
1 http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian experimental/main amd64
Packages
*** 1.12.12-1
To rule out the obvious, can you paste the output of
apt-cache policy dbus-user-session dbus-x11
(you want dbus-user-session if you are using systemd --user)
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 6:09 PM Julien Leproust wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been hit by seemingly the same bug on two of my machines.
>
> Since about mid-February, I noticed that my two Debian sid desktops no
> longer produced any sound. On one of them, I use lightdm+mate, on the
> other I use
Hi,
I've been hit by seemingly the same bug on two of my machines.
Since about mid-February, I noticed that my two Debian sid desktops no
longer produced any sound. On one of them, I use lightdm+mate, on the
other I use lightdm+kodi. Both were updated roughly weekly, with only
official sid
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:12 PM Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 systemd
>
> Hallo,
> * Felipe Sateler [Thu, Feb 21 2019, 10:32:29AM]:
> >On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 3:59 PM Eduard Bloch <[1]e...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Feb 08 20:38:51 zombie at-spi-bus-launcher[2625]: XIO: fatal IO
>
Control: reassign -1 systemd
Hallo,
* Felipe Sateler [Thu, Feb 21 2019, 10:32:29AM]:
>On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 3:59 PM Eduard Bloch <[1]e...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Feb 08 20:38:51 zombie at-spi-bus-launcher[2625]: XIO: fatal IO error
> 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 3:59 PM Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Hallo,
> * Felipe Sateler [Wed, Feb 20 2019, 02:46:32PM]:
>
> > Yeah, so I tried also real username instead of "user" here, etc.
> still
> > getting "invalid argument" message. Which IMHO makes sense since, as
> > said, the
Hallo,
* Felipe Sateler [Wed, Feb 20 2019, 02:46:32PM]:
> Yeah, so I tried also real username instead of "user" here, etc. still
> getting "invalid argument" message. Which IMHO makes sense since, as
> said, the systemd user instance was not started.
>
>Use journalctl --unit
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019, 14:25 Eduard Bloch Hallo,
> * Felipe Sateler [Mon, Feb 18 2019, 06:34:37PM]:
> >Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> >On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:36 PM Eduard Bloch <[1]e...@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > Package: libpam-systemd
> > Version: 240-5
> > Severity: normal
>
Hallo,
* Felipe Sateler [Mon, Feb 18 2019, 06:34:37PM]:
>Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:36 PM Eduard Bloch <[1]e...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Package: libpam-systemd
> Version: 240-5
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> a few days ago some user services
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:36 PM Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Package: libpam-systemd
> Version: 240-5
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> a few days ago some user services started failed - I mainly noticed that
> pulseaudio was no longer available.
> This looked very strange, and
Package: libpam-systemd
Version: 240-5
Severity: normal
Hi,
a few days ago some user services started failed - I mainly noticed that
pulseaudio was no longer available.
This looked very strange, and while checking other systems, I saw that
"systemd --user" is not launched, which would have
26 matches
Mail list logo
