Another thing I should mention is that I accidentally (I swear) ended up
in memtest86 during some kernel switching tests, and figured I would let
that run. It found about a dozen errors in 10-20 minutes testing, so
there's also that: it could be a problem with the RAM.
That said, those are new
On 2021-05-03 20:44:31, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2021-05-03 20:27:26, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Interestingly, it seems that the machine indeed doesn't go to sleep: it
>> loops over a failure to sleep and fills up syslog with errors as long as
>> it's trying to sleep, pretty
On 2021-05-03 20:27:26, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
[...]
> Interestingly, it seems that the machine indeed doesn't go to sleep: it
> loops over a failure to sleep and fills up syslog with errors as long as
> it's trying to sleep, pretty catastrophic, from a battery usage
> perspective.
>
> I attach
On 2021-05-03 07:37:42, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: found -1 5.10.24-1
>
> Hi Antoine,
>
> On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 08:22:07PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2021-05-01 07:59:01, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> > Hi Antoine
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 07:34:04PM -0400, Antoine
On 2021-05-03 07:37:42, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: found -1 5.10.24-1
>
> Hi Antoine,
>
> On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 08:22:07PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2021-05-01 07:59:01, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> > Hi Antoine
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 07:34:04PM -0400, Antoine
Control: found -1 5.10.24-1
Hi Antoine,
On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 08:22:07PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2021-05-01 07:59:01, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi Antoine
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 07:34:04PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> >> On 2021-04-30 21:04:29, Salvatore Bonaccorso
On 2021-05-01 07:59:01, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Antoine
>
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 07:34:04PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2021-04-30 21:04:29, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>> >
>> > Hi Tollef, Antoine,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 08:20:22PM
Hi Antoine
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 07:34:04PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2021-04-30 21:04:29, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > Hi Tollef, Antoine,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 08:20:22PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> >> Control: forcemerge 922666
On 2021-04-30 21:04:29, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> Hi Tollef, Antoine,
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 08:20:22PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> Control: forcemerge 922666 928189
>> Control: severity 922666 important
>> Control: tags 922666 +patch +confirmed
>>
>>
]] Salvatore Bonaccorso
> Can you confirm if this issue is still present with a recent kernel?
I haven't seen it for quite some time on my Buster machine, so from my
point of view, it can be closed.
Regards,
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Tollef, Antoine,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 08:20:22PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Control: forcemerge 922666 928189
> Control: severity 922666 important
> Control: tags 922666 +patch +confirmed
>
> I also see a regression with touchpads and trackpoint on a
Control: forcemerge 922666 928189
Control: severity 922666 important
Control: tags 922666 +patch +confirmed
I also see a regression with touchpads and trackpoint on a Thinkpad E431
after upgrading from Debian stretch to buster. My research indicates
this is a kernel regression, as yet to be
12 matches
Mail list logo
