Bug#922809: unblock: aac-tactics/8.8.0+1.gbp069dc3b-1
tags 922809 wontfix thanks Hi Benjamin, On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 20:55:31 -0400 Benjamin Barenblat wrote: > > Couldn't you just fix the FTBFS by patching the original version in > > Debian? That would make reviewing a lot easier. > > Perhaps, but unfortunately, I don’t have the time to write those patches > right now. If the new version is too much to accept into buster at this > point, please feel free to close this as a wontfix – I think the world > can live without aac-tactics for one release cycle. So, that is what I end up doing. It's getting to late into the cycle to let new packages in. Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#922809: unblock: aac-tactics/8.8.0+1.gbp069dc3b-1
On Saturday, March 9, 2019, at 3:17 PM EST, Paul Gevers wrote: > [...] I took a look at the times in the bug, and it seems you uploaded > the package *after* it got removed. > > Is it just me, or did you suggest a different time line? If so, why? No, it’s not just you – I believed that I had uploaded the package before it was autorm’d. However, I believed that based on what qa.debian.org said. Without looking too closely, my guess is that I uploaded after the package had been removed but before qa.debian.org’s data had been updated. > Couldn't you just fix the FTBFS by patching the original version in > Debian? That would make reviewing a lot easier. Perhaps, but unfortunately, I don’t have the time to write those patches right now. If the new version is too much to accept into buster at this point, please feel free to close this as a wontfix – I think the world can live without aac-tactics for one release cycle. Thanks for looking into this, Benjamin
Bug#922809: unblock: aac-tactics/8.8.0+1.gbp069dc3b-1
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 21-02-2019 00:20, Benjamin Barenblat wrote: > I uploaded coq/8.9.0-1 to unstable shortly before the soft freeze > began. Unfortunately, this caused aac-tactics to FTBFS > (https://bugs.debian.org/919463) and be scheduled for autoremoval. I > uploaded a new aac-tactics, fixing the build, but the autoremoval timer > ran out before it was migrated. For next time, if you ping the bug, the timer gets reset. Which also happens when the upload that fixes the bug gets accepted. Because this confused me, I took a look at the times in the bug, and it seems you uploaded the package *after* it got removed. Is it just me, or did you suggest a different time line? If so, why? > aac-tactics is a leaf package, so > allowing it to migrate is unlikely to produce instability in the new > release. Would you consider an unblock? Not instability, no, but you uploaded a different version of upstream, so there can be a whole load of new bugs. Couldn't you just fix the FTBFS by patching the original version in Debian? That would make reviewing a lot easier. Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#922809: unblock: aac-tactics/8.8.0+1.gbp069dc3b-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package aac-tactics I uploaded coq/8.9.0-1 to unstable shortly before the soft freeze began. Unfortunately, this caused aac-tactics to FTBFS (https://bugs.debian.org/919463) and be scheduled for autoremoval. I uploaded a new aac-tactics, fixing the build, but the autoremoval timer ran out before it was migrated. aac-tactics is a leaf package, so allowing it to migrate is unlikely to produce instability in the new release. Would you consider an unblock? unblock aac-tactics/8.8.0+1.gbp069dc3b-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.8 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
