Bug#923722: golang-github-appc-cni: Please upgrade to new upstream 0.7.0-alpha1
Hi Reinhard, On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 07:20 -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Package: golang-github-appc-cni > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > > Please update to new upstream version of 0.7.0-alpha1. I need it as a > build dependency of http://github.com/containers/buildah By now you could try to get 0.7.1, released a couple of hours ago: https://github.com/containernetworking/cni/releases/tag/v0.7.1 > > In fact, I've done so locally, and would be happy to upload it as a Team > Upload. I was running into issues while doing so. Unlike the git > repositories created by the dh-make-golang tool, the git repository on > salsa at > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-appc-cni does > not include full sources in the packaging branch. I am unfamiliar with > that workflow and it is inconsistent with how the vast majority of the > packages in the golang team are handled. I therefore decided to start > off from a 'dgit clone' created repository. > > Dimtry, I wonder what your thoughts on this issue are. Would you be OK > with switching the workflow? If not, could you please upload > 0.7.0-alpha1 to experimental soon? Alternatively, I could upload the > package that I have locally to experimental, and leave updating salsa to > you (or someone else) whenever time permits. > > What does the rest of the team think about competing git repository > workflows within the team? At least to me, this seems undesireable > because it prompts convesations like this (which I really don't enjoy > having). I'm also puzzled why this packaging. Just my 2 cents, although I'm not part of the team, but having a look at some packages needed for containers. > > Best, > -rt > A different, but related question. Are there any known efforts to package the reference plugins? BR, Silvano
Bug#923722: golang-github-appc-cni: Please upgrade to new upstream 0.7.0-alpha1
Package: golang-github-appc-cni Severity: wishlist Hi, Please update to new upstream version of 0.7.0-alpha1. I need it as a build dependency of http://github.com/containers/buildah In fact, I've done so locally, and would be happy to upload it as a Team Upload. I was running into issues while doing so. Unlike the git repositories created by the dh-make-golang tool, the git repository on salsa at https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-appc-cni does not include full sources in the packaging branch. I am unfamiliar with that workflow and it is inconsistent with how the vast majority of the packages in the golang team are handled. I therefore decided to start off from a 'dgit clone' created repository. Dimtry, I wonder what your thoughts on this issue are. Would you be OK with switching the workflow? If not, could you please upload 0.7.0-alpha1 to experimental soon? Alternatively, I could upload the package that I have locally to experimental, and leave updating salsa to you (or someone else) whenever time permits. What does the rest of the team think about competing git repository workflows within the team? At least to me, this seems undesireable because it prompts convesations like this (which I really don't enjoy having). Best, -rt -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.7 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (75, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
