Control: tag -1 pending
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 03:29:52PM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Ok, but this still should be fixed in stretch, right?
> > (Packages in stretch must build in stretch).
>
> Sure thing, but this would require a stable update which seems a
> little overkill, especially at
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:13:46PM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > The relevant thing, IMO, is that proposed-updates and point
> > releases still exist for stretch, so I don't see it overkill
>
> Sure. Can you still loop the SRMs in on this before I backport this
> patch and create a stretchpu
Hi Santiago,
> The relevant thing, IMO, is that proposed-updates and point
> releases still exist for stretch, so I don't see it overkill
Sure. Can you still loop the SRMs in on this before I backport this
patch and create a stretchpu bug, etc. etc.? Thanks. :)
> I don't see how the release
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 03:29:52PM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Santiago,
>
> > Ok, but this still should be fixed in stretch, right?
> > (Packages in stretch must build in stretch).
>
> Sure thing, but this would require a stable update which seems a
> little overkill, especially at this point
Hi Santiago,
> Ok, but this still should be fixed in stretch, right?
> (Packages in stretch must build in stretch).
Sure thing, but this would require a stable update which seems a
little overkill, especially at this point in the buster release cycle…?
Fancy pinging the SRMs on this? Not had to
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 03:22:26PM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote:
> I believe this was address on the diffoscope side here:
>
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/commit/4a35e55497fac9845ca55be28fbd9e25b4e8576f
>
> ... which was released in diffoscope 112.
Ok, but this
fixed 925051 112
thanks
Hi Santiago,
> I tried to build this package in stretch but it failed:
[…]
This is because ghostscript was updated in stretch and it
(unfortunately) now generates different output.
I believe this was address on the diffoscope side here:
Package: src:diffoscope
Version: 78
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in stretch but it failed:
[...]
debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with python3 --with
8 matches
Mail list logo