Bug#926278: Please build a separate binary package to ship rubygems

2019-04-23 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 10:09:07PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: libruby2.5
> Version: 2.5.5-1
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> rubygems are currently a part of libruby2.5. Can you please split them into a
> separate binary package like ruby2.5-rubygems (which libruby2.5 would still
> depennd upon)?
> 
> With jruby we have a second Ruby implementation in the archive (which embeds
> rubygems unmodified) and currently whenever there's a ruby security release
> which needs fixes to rubygems we also need to update jruby (while the Jruby
> interpreter usually isn't affected by many of the security bugs in the
> C-based ruby implementation).

We used to have a separate rubygems package, but stopped doing it when
rubygems got merged into the stdlib. I would prefet going back to that
to produce a binary from the interpreter. (which solves this problem
just the same)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#926278: Please build a separate binary package to ship rubygems

2019-04-02 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: libruby2.5
Version: 2.5.5-1
Severity: wishlist

rubygems are currently a part of libruby2.5. Can you please split them into a
separate binary package like ruby2.5-rubygems (which libruby2.5 would still
depennd upon)?

With jruby we have a second Ruby implementation in the archive (which embeds
rubygems unmodified) and currently whenever there's a ruby security release
which needs fixes to rubygems we also need to update jruby (while the Jruby
interpreter usually isn't affected by many of the security bugs in the
C-based ruby implementation).

(For bullseye, too intrusive for buster)

Cheers,
Moritz