Bug#933958: The golang FTBFS on amd64 should be fixed

2019-08-05 Thread Dr. Tobias Quathamer
control: reopen -1
control: reassign -1 src:golang-1.12
control: found -1 1.12.7-2

Am 05.08.19 um 20:59 schrieb Shengjing Zhu:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:03 AM Dr. Tobias Quathamer  wrote:
>>
>> the FTBFS of golang should be fixed. It was due to the GOCACHE changes
>> from Go 1.11 to Go 1.12. Anthony Fok has just fixed this in dh-golang.
>>
> 
> The golang compiler doesn't build depends dh-golang. So any change in
> dh-golang won't fix the compiler itself.

You're right, of course. I jumped to that conclusion due to the error
message "failed to initialize build cache".

I don't know why my first build succeeded -- now I can reproduce the
FTBFS :-(

However, I think I have found the solution for golang-1.12 (very similar
to dh-golang). I'm currently building the package and will upload the
fix soon.

Regards,
Tobias



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#933958: The golang FTBFS on amd64 should be fixed

2019-08-05 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Hi,

On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:03 AM Dr. Tobias Quathamer  wrote:
>
> the FTBFS of golang should be fixed. It was due to the GOCACHE changes
> from Go 1.11 to Go 1.12. Anthony Fok has just fixed this in dh-golang.
>

The golang compiler doesn't build depends dh-golang. So any change in
dh-golang won't fix the compiler itself.

-- 
Shengjing Zhu



Bug#933958: The golang FTBFS on amd64 should be fixed

2019-08-05 Thread Dr. Tobias Quathamer
control: reassign -1 dh-golang
control: found -1 1.39
control: fixed -1 1.41
control: close -1

Hi,

the FTBFS of golang should be fixed. It was due to the GOCACHE changes
from Go 1.11 to Go 1.12. Anthony Fok has just fixed this in dh-golang.

I can confirm that golang-1.12 builds fine in an updated sid chroot on
amd64 for me.

Regards,
Tobias



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature