Hi,
On 1/21/20 5:51 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 1/20/20 5:38 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Looks like britney needs some help to migrate everything to testing. The
update_output.txt shows most rdeps, I can't make sense of why it's not
migrating them.
Paul asked me to look at this.
On 1/20/20 5:38 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Looks like britney needs some help to migrate everything to testing. The
> update_output.txt shows most rdeps, I can't make sense of why it's not
> migrating them.
DDPO shows 3.0.3+dfsg-1 in testing-proposed-updates, is that intended?
Kind Regard
Looks like britney needs some help to migrate everything to testing. The
update_output.txt shows most rdeps, I can't make sense of why it's not
migrating them.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Hi Sebastiaan,
On 12-01-2020 08:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Probably I am saying something stupid, but e.g. gdal-data () breaks
>> libgdal* . I notice that the library already has a larger than
>> relation on gdal-data, but apparently there should have been a smaller
>> than relation as we
On 1/11/20 9:48 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> gdal triggers autopkgtest regressions in two packages and looking at the
> logs I am wondering if that point to a missing dependency relation, as
> the tests pass in unstable once they were binNMU'ed.
>
> In both tests, libgdal20 from testing is installed (
Hi,
On 11-01-2020 17:38, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 1/9/20 6:52 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 1/8/20 4:53 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> gdal (3.0.2+dfsg-1) is now built & installed on all release architectures.
>>>
>>> Please schedule the binNMUs.
>>
>> Thanks for scheduling
On 1/9/20 6:52 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 1/8/20 4:53 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> gdal (3.0.2+dfsg-1) is now built & installed on all release architectures.
>>
>> Please schedule the binNMUs.
>
> Thanks for scheduling the initial batch, everything has built now.
> Please schedul
On 1/10/20 11:06 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 1/9/20 6:52 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 1/8/20 4:53 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> gdal (3.0.2+dfsg-1) is now built & installed on all release architectures.
>>>
>>> Please schedule the binNMUs.
>>
>> Thanks for scheduling the
On 1/9/20 6:52 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 1/8/20 4:53 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> gdal (3.0.2+dfsg-1) is now built & installed on all release architectures.
>>
>> Please schedule the binNMUs.
>
> Thanks for scheduling the initial batch, everything has built now.
> Please schedul
On 1/8/20 4:53 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> gdal (3.0.2+dfsg-1) is now built & installed on all release architectures.
>
> Please schedule the binNMUs.
Thanks for scheduling the initial batch, everything has built now.
Please schedule the rest of Dependency level 1.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
On 1/8/20 5:48 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 1/8/20 5:31 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 1/7/20 10:21 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> I hinted libvigraimpex just now, once it migrates, please go ahead.
>>
>> Today GDAL 3.0.3RC1 will be released, it's probably a good idea to wait
>> for it
On 1/8/20 5:31 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 1/7/20 10:21 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I hinted libvigraimpex just now, once it migrates, please go ahead.
>
> Today GDAL 3.0.3RC1 will be released, it's probably a good idea to wait
> for its final release, likely a week later.
On second thoug
On 1/7/20 10:21 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 24-11-2019 08:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Let's see what happens first: this, or the QGIS 3.10.4 release which
>> makes use of GDAL 3 features.
>
> So, did the release of QGIS 3.10.4 or higher already happened?
No, it's scheduled for February 21
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Sebastiaan,
On 24-11-2019 08:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Once both networkx packages have migrated to testing we're good to go
>> with the gdal transition.
This happened yesterday.
> Let's see what happens first: this, or the QGIS 3.10.4 release which
> mak
On 11/23/19 10:15 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 08-11-2019 06:43, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> python-networkx is finally fixed, please remove the block to let gdal
>> migrate to testing, and let's move on with this transition.
>
> python-networkx doesn't want to migrate, probably due to networkx
Hi
On 08-11-2019 06:43, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> python-networkx is finally fixed, please remove the block to let gdal
> migrate to testing, and let's move on with this transition.
python-networkx doesn't want to migrate, probably due to networkx not
migrating. That in turn may (or may not)
Hello Emilio,
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 4:57 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> As it's been said, we need to disentangle the gdal library transition from the
> python2 removal. So either python2 support gets added back to 3.0.1 so that we
> can transition to that without the new lib getting stuck i
On 01/10/2019 19:23, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> And for the record, the next upload of gdal to unstable which will
> likely be of the 2.4 series will also drop the Python 2 support, so not
> providing python-gdal won't be an argument to block this transition.
As it's been said, we need to dise
On 9/17/19 2:41 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> While it's true we are trying to remove python 2 from Debian
> (https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal), this shouldnt be done while
> reverse dependencies are still present in the archive (quoting from
> the previous link "NOTE: If there are reverse depend
Hello Release Team,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 3:54 PM Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 3.x. This is the
> next step in the major update of the GIS stack after PROJ 6.
>
> All reverse dependencies rebuilt successfully with GDAL 3.0.1 from
> experimental
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: block -1 by 939872 939891 931944
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html
For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 3.x. This
21 matches
Mail list logo