Bug#944296: debian-policy: Source provenance requirement is WET

2019-11-16 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Sat 16 Nov 2019 at 04:13AM +01, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sat, 2019-11-09 at 08:55:23 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: >> On Thu 07 Nov 2019 at 09:00AM -08, Russ Allbery wrote: >> > I'm in favor of dropping this information from debian/copyright and >> > instead writing some language saying

Bug#944296: debian-policy: Source provenance requirement is WET

2019-11-15 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sat, 2019-11-09 at 08:55:23 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Thu 07 Nov 2019 at 09:00AM -08, Russ Allbery wrote: > > I'm in favor of dropping this information from debian/copyright and > > instead writing some language saying that packages should include this > > information in Homepage in

Bug#944296: debian-policy: Source provenance requirement is WET

2019-11-09 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Thu 07 Nov 2019 at 09:00AM -08, Russ Allbery wrote: > I'm in favor of dropping this information from debian/copyright and > instead writing some language saying that packages should include this > information in Homepage in debian/control and, if there's a substantial > non-obvious

Bug#944296: debian-policy: Source provenance requirement is WET

2019-11-09 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:00:29 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > IMO, ideally the requirement in policy would be lifted by clarifying > > that the information should be provided in *either* debian/copyright > > or debian/watch. > > Personally, I usually find they're not the same thing. debian/watch

Bug#944296: debian-policy: Source provenance requirement is WET

2019-11-07 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 09:00:29 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Guillem Jover writes: > > This means that when using a debian/watch file one has to duplicate > > the information in two places, with the possibility of this getting > > out-of-sync, etc. > > > In addition the machine readable

Bug#944296: debian-policy: Source provenance requirement is WET

2019-11-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Guillem Jover writes: > This means that when using a debian/watch file one has to duplicate > the information in two places, with the possibility of this getting > out-of-sync, etc. > In addition the machine readable debian/copyright format, specifies > the Source field as optional, which could

Bug#944296: debian-policy: Source provenance requirement is WET

2019-11-07 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: debian-policy Version: 4.4.1.1 Severity: wishlist Hi! We currently require (with a must) in section ยง12.5, to add to the debian/copyright, where the upstream source was obtained from: ,--- In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream sources (if any) were obtained,