Bug#956821: igraph: FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
Hi Peter, On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:26:59PM +0100, peter green wrote: > It seems that the old igraph binaries were removed and this bug report was > downgraded but python3-igraph is still present on the FTBFS architectures and > still build-depends on libigraph-dev I realised this as well. I'm currently building with a patch that should finally work. > I also find it strange that python3-igraph has a build-dependency but not a > runtime dependency on igraph. Is this a bug in itself? Python3-igraph is from python-igraph package which is maintained by DPMT. I admit its the first time I take notice of this package. I tried python3 -c "import igraph" without havung libigraph installed without any problem. So I simply assume it does what it is supposed to do. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#956821: igraph: FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
Hi It seems that the old igraph binaries were removed and this bug report was downgraded but python3-igraph is still present on the FTBFS architectures and still build-depends on libigraph-dev I also find it strange that python3-igraph has a build-dependency but not a runtime dependency on igraph. Is this a bug in itself?
Bug#956821: igraph: FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
Control: tags -1 upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/igraph/igraph/issues/1370
Bug#956821: igraph: FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
Source: igraph Version: 0.8.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs sid bullseye Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) igraph failed to build almost everywhere. See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=igraph=sid Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature