Bug#970268: mksh: autopkgtests fail on s390x because /usr/lib/klibc/bin/mksh is not +x

2020-09-16 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Michael Hudson-Doyle dixit: >Hi, thanks for the quick fix, unfortunately the tests now fail because >there is output on stderr: AGH! autopkgtests are… “fun”. I’ll log into zelenka and have a look. Thanks! bye, //mirabilos -- [16:04:33] bkix: "veni vidi violini" [16:04:45] bkix: "ich kam,

Bug#970268: mksh: autopkgtests fail on s390x because /usr/lib/klibc/bin/mksh is not +x

2020-09-16 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi, thanks for the quick fix, unfortunately the tests now fail because there is output on stderr: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/s390x/m/mksh/20200915_225445_fb4b8@/log.gz

Bug#970268: mksh: autopkgtests fail on s390x because /usr/lib/klibc/bin/mksh is not +x

2020-09-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Michael Hudson-Doyle dixit: >As noted in bug 943425, mksh mis-behaves on s390s when linked against >klibc. The test suite reacts to this by chmod -x-ing the binary, but the >test suite then fails: Gah, of course it does! Thanks for messaging me, I’ll fix that. bye, //mirabilos -- 15:41⎜

Bug#970268: mksh: autopkgtests fail on s390x because /usr/lib/klibc/bin/mksh is not +x

2020-09-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: mksh Version: 59b-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, As noted in bug 943425, mksh mis-behaves on s390s when linked against klibc. The test suite reacts to this by chmod -x-ing the binary, but the test suite then fails: