Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 296824 normal
Bug#296824: sbcl: Stale fasls
Severity set to `normal'.
retitle 296824 Please upload new version of sbcl to fix bug
Bug#296824: sbcl: Stale fasls
Changed Bug title.
tags 296824 + pending
Bug#296824: Please upload new version
severity 296824 normal
retitle 296824 Please upload new version of sbcl to fix bug
tags 296824 + pending
thanks
Alan Shields wrote:
The issue was that the fasls weren't recognized as incompatible. I put
in the recompile-stale-fasls code and it thought everything was fine. I
was given to
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:54:40 +0900 (JST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: still present in sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:17:14 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#295428: fixed in apache2 2.0.53-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: libgnomedb
Severity: serious
Version: 1.0.4-8
From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:
...
*** Building HTML ***
test -d ./html || mkdir ./html
cd ./html gtkdoc-mkhtml libgnomedb ../libgnomedb-docs.sgml
/usr/bin/jade:../sgml/gnome-db-config.sgml:68:69:E: character : is not
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:07:50PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
A subshell forked in eval or a dot file within an or list does not
return, causing the parent shell to block:
Good catch. We need to check whether the EXEVAL is thrown by a subshell
and if so relay it to the top.
Please try these
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:09:11PM +1100, herbert wrote:
Good catch. We need to check whether the EXEVAL is thrown by a subshell
and if so relay it to the top.
Please try these two patches instead.
We need one more patch. EXEVAL should not modify the exit status.
--
Visit Openswan at
An attachment named installation96.exe was removed from this document as it
constituted a security hazard. If you require this document, please contact
the sender and arrange an alternate means of receiving it.
Microsoft
All Products|
Support|
Search|
Microsoft.com Guide
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0+dfsg.1-6
Followup-For: Bug #294415
Hi,
As I see, a new Firefox upstream version is released as 1.0.1[1]. This
release contains the security fixes that the Debian package _may_
already have, but may contain other security fixes. Also, it fixes some
other
I did the KDE 3 port of cervisia (kpartifying etc.), and the CVS
import. I'm not really interested in licenses. If others want to
dual-license my parts of the code with GPL that's fine I personally
couldn't care less. I'm equally unbothered if Debian remove it (though
I do wonder if the final
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-13
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
Cite:
The reiserfs_copy_from_user_to_file_region function in reiserfs/file.c for
Linux kernel
2.6.10 and 2.6.11 before 2.6.11-rc4, when running on 64-bit architectures, may
allow
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-13
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
Cite:
The atm_get_addr function in addr.c for Linux kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 before
2.6.11-rc4
may allow local users to trigger a buffer overflow via negative arguments.
The
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-13
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
Cite:
Linux kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.11rc1-bk6 uses different size types
for offset arguments to the proc_file_read and locks_read_proc
functions, which leads to a heap-based buffer
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-13
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Signedness error in the copy_from_read_buf function in n_tty.c for
Linux kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.11rc1 allows local users to read kernel
memory via a negative argument.
The offending
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 10:56 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 02:53:43PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Why was the sarge tag removed? Did I misuse it?
Probably. The sarge tag is for bugs that only appear in testing but not
in unstable. Since I couldn't see anything in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 296899 -1
Bug#296899: CAN-2005-0531: Buffer overflow in atm_get_addr
Bug 296899 cloned as bug 296905.
reassign -1 kernel-source-2.4.27
Bug#296905: CAN-2005-0531: Buffer overflow in atm_get_addr
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.8'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
reassign 262925
cman,cman-kernel,ccs,dlm,dlm-kernel,fence,gfs,gfs-kernel,gnbd-kernel,iddev,magma,magma-plugins
Bug#262925: gfs framework should not enter testing
Bug reassigned from
Hi there,
Please help testing the new OpenLDAP 2.2 packages at
http://pkg-openldap.alioth.debian.org/
I'd like to know if they fix the index and data corruption problems.
Thanks
Torsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: nvclock
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
*** Please type your report below this line ***
nvclock's Description states:
You need to have the official nVidia drivers installed.
However, the Depends on the package does not reflect this. If the
package does indeed depend on
* Pierre Habouzit [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:50:54 +0100]:
- : this is really not trivial : inetd.conf is sorted by categories,
and it will be really difficult to put the entries at the right
place in the postinst
In fact, is not very difficult, since you just feed update-inetd the
for what it's worth, http://dotlocal.org/mdnsd/ appears to be a
GPL/BSD dual licensed implementation of multicast dns... not sure how
elegant the code is, but it's at least a start. Hasn't been updated
in about 2 years though, so there may not be any upstream at this
point.
-Joe
--
To
* Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0+dfsg.1-6
Followup-For: Bug #294415
Hi,
As I see, a new Firefox upstream version is released as 1.0.1[1]. This
release contains the security fixes that the Debian package _may_
already have, but may
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:50:54 +0100]:
- : this is really not trivial : inetd.conf is sorted by categories,
and it will be really difficult to put the entries at the right
place in the postinst
In fact, is not very
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 295146 moreinfo
Bug#295146: kernel: can delete root directories
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
severity 295146 important
Bug#295146: kernel: can delete root directories
Severity set to `important'.
stop
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 291209 -sarge
Bug#291209: csmash window black !
Tags were: sarge confirmed
Tags removed: sarge
close 291209
Bug#291209: csmash window black !
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further
Package: ipsec-tools
Version: 1:0.5-3
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
In restart target of the setkey init script setkey is run with the
following command:
$SETKEY -f $SETKEY_CONF:
This fails of course since it appends ':' to the configuration file
name. Potential security
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:47:16 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#279374: fixed in javax-servletapi2.3 4.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:02:14 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#280134: fixed in libgd 1.8.4.debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 14:39 schrieb Richard Moore:
I did the KDE 3 port of cervisia (kpartifying etc.), and the CVS
import. I'm not really interested in licenses. If others want to
dual-license my parts of the code with GPL that's fine I personally
couldn't care less. I'm equally
Hi,
On jeu, fév 03, 2005, Loïc Minier wrote:
So I'm about to get a fresh xfsprogs or a live CD and xfs_repair my FS
to get a log and send it upstream.
I've lost my log, I successfully uploaded it to another box, but the
box was running an evil OS which decided that it wouldn't
Le Ven 25 Février 2005 17:32, Frank Küster a écrit :
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:50:54 +0100]:
- : this is really not trivial : inetd.conf is sorted by
categories, and it will be really difficult to put the entries at
the right place in
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:48:18 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gftp: DSA 686-1: directory traversal vulnerability
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 289440 -sarge
Bug#289440: k3b crashes when pressing Burn
Tags were: sarge patch
Tags removed: sarge
close 289440
Bug#289440: k3b crashes when pressing Burn
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send
Package: webcalendar
Version: 0.9.45-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The Setting up of webcalendar fails with following output:
Setting up webcalendar (0.9.45-3) ...
Search pattern not terminated at -e line 1.
dpkg: error processing webcalendar (--configure):
On Friday 25 February 2005 03:30, Ben Burton wrote:
Hi.
Currently cervisia is licensed under the QPL. As the maintainer of
kdesdk in debian, I am unfortunately faced with having to remove
cervisia from the debian distribution since the QPL does not meet
with debian's free software
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:02:17 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#288829: fixed in apt-proxy 1.9.27
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:42:43PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
Package: webcalendar
Version: 0.9.45-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The Setting up of webcalendar fails with following output:
Setting up webcalendar (0.9.45-3) ...
Search pattern not terminated
Hello,
thanks for answering the bug report.
I did as you requested, and then tried an install of the package. This
is the output:
Setting up webcalendar (0.9.45-3) ...
+ Version=0.9.45-1
+ set -e
+ . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
++ '[' '!' '' ']'
++ PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1
++ export PERL_DL_NONLAZY
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:53:48PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
Hello,
thanks for answering the bug report.
I did as you requested, and then tried an install of the package. This
is the output:
Okay, it is as I suspected; perl is somehow causing the problem.
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If that
Hi!
3dwm has an additional Build-Dep on libxmu-dev. Without this, the configure
test will fail. It also tests for libglut, but doesn't seem to require it.
Regards, David
--
- hallo... wie gehts heute?
- *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch*
- gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisches medium ;)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 293195 concurrent usage of snd_cmipci and sk98lin freezes system
Bug#293195:
=?utf-8?q?kernel-image-2=2E6=2E10-1-k7=3A_concurrent_usage_of_snd=5Fcmipc?=
=?utf-8?q?i_and_sk98lin_freezes_system=0D=0AHello=2C?=
Changed Bug title.
flags 295344 -
Hi Matt, *!
Do you have ulimits (max RAM, max CPU or so) enabled on your system? A friend
of mine had apache crashing without useful errormessages after memory
limiting apache and installing another module and thus exceeding the
allowance...
Regards, David
--
- hallo... wie gehts heute?
-
Hi Siggi, *!
I could reproduce this on a current sid machine:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ [EMAIL PROTECTED] gxine /tmp/gxine.out 21
Segmentation fault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Here is also the backtrace from gdb, sorry no debugging info:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching
Hi David,
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 00:42 +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
Do you have ulimits (max RAM, max CPU or so) enabled on your system? A friend
of mine had apache crashing without useful errormessages after memory
limiting apache and installing another module and thus exceeding the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 296732 patch
Bug#296732: 3dwm: FTBFS: Fails to detect OpenGL
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 295344 - unreproducible
Bug#295344: segfaults on startup
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Of course I forgot the patch..
diff -ur old/kernel-image-speakup-i386-2.4.27/debian/changelog
kernel-image-speakup-i386-2.4.27/debian/changelog
--- old/kernel-image-speakup-i386-2.4.27/debian/changelog 2004-08-19
15:41:32.0 -0400
+++
I'm NMUing the speakup kernel so we can get the security fixes in place
in time for d-i rc3. I've attached the NMU diff.
I'm not very pleased to have to do this, since while I've tested the new
kernel in d-i, I don't have the actual hardware or knowledge to test the
speakup bits of it. The patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 295624 + fixed
Bug#295624: not yet rebuilt with security fixes
Tags were: security
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:23:36 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line 296395 is closed in 0.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 260808
Bug#260808: avifile-player: Crashed X
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
reopen 260808
thanks
Reopening this bug report.
You must not close bugs in changelogs if you did not *change* anything.
Please handle this bug report correclty.
Greetings,
Erich Schubert
--
erich@(vitavonni.de|debian.org)--GPG Key ID: 4B3A135C(o_
Which is worse: ignorance or
Package: udev
Version: 0.053-1
Severity: grave
I installed gnome on a running system and this pulled in udev. After the
installation was complete, I noticed that /dev/null was not a device,
was only writable by root, and probably contained some output redirected from
some program that ran during
Brian Ristuccia wrote:
Package: clamsmtp
Version: 1.2-3
Severity: serious
The init.d script for clamsmtp breaks with start-stop-daemon in dpkg
(1.9.21) because it doesn't provide the --group option. It needs to use one
of the various dependancy mechanisms to make sure a newer dpkg
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:02:09 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#295112: fixed in clamsmtp 1.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: sgml2x
Severity: serious
Version: 1.0.0-8
From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:
...
links -dump TODO-html/t1.htm TODO.txt
ELinks: Permission denied
make[1]: *** [TODO.txt] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/sgml2x-1.0.0'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
I
Package: gworkspace.app
Version: 0.6.5-3; reported 2005-02-26
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
hello,
well, it *might* work smoothly indeed, but the fact is that I'm accessing
a Sarge sys via a vnc session at 8bit, and all I got is:
2005-02-26 06:59:40.000
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 289623 -sarge
Bug#289623: openoffice.org-thesaurus-it: should depend on openoffice.org
Tags were: patch sarge
Tags removed: sarge
close 289623
Bug#289623: openoffice.org-thesaurus-it: should depend on openoffice.org
'close' is deprecated; see
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:47:07 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#296912: fixed in ipsec-tools 1:0.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
59 matches
Mail list logo